ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2022
Electrostatic Contributions to the Binding Free Energy of Nicotine to the Acetylcholine Binding Protein.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pro-angiogenic potential of the isoxazole derivative ISO-1 via α7-nAChRs activation in human endothelial cells.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Dental biomaterials redefined: molecular docking and dynamics-driven dental resin composite optimization.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Biomolecular Electrostatic Phenomena: An Evergreen Field.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Biomolecular binding relies on specific attractive interactions between two partner molecules, including electrostatics, dispersion, hydrophobicity, and solvation. Assessing the contributions of electrostatic interactions to binding is key to the understanding of ligand binding mechanisms and the design of improved biomolecular binders. For example, nicotine is a well-known agonist of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), but the molecular mechanisms for the differential action of nicotine on brain and muscle nAChRs remain elusive. In this work, we have chosen the acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP) in complex with nicotine as a model system to interrogate the electrostatic contributions to nicotine binding. Our absolute binding free energy simulations confirm that nicotine binds AChBP predominantly in its protonated (charged) form. By comparing energetic contributions from decomposed interactions for either neutral or charged nicotine, our calculations shed light on the nature of the binding of nicotine to the AChBP. The preferred binding of charged nicotine over neutral nicotine originates from its stronger electrostatic interactions with AChBP, a cation-π interaction to a tryptophan residue and a hydrogen bond between nicotine and the backbone carbonyl of the tryptophan, whereas the major force driving the binding process appears to be van der Waals interactions. The various nonelectrostatic terms can also indirectly modulate the electrostatic interactions through fine-tuning the binding pose of the ligand in the binding site, providing an explanation of why the binding specificity of nicotine to the brain versus muscle nAChRs is driven by electrostatic interaction, given that the immediate binding site residues, including the key tryptophan residue, are identical in the two receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.