Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36260253›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2022

Estimated specific antibody-based true sero-prevalences of canine filariosis in dogs in Central Europe and the UK.

Jeannine E Fehr, Manuela Schnyder, Deborah E Joekel, Nikola Pantchev, Mindaugas Sarkunas, Paul Torgerson, Peter Deplazes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. New Insights into the Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. A Rare Case Report of a HumanMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  4. The long-distance relationship betweenFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jeannine E FehrInstitute of Parasitology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Manuela SchnyderInstitute of Parasitology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland. manuela.schnyder@uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6523-7952
Deborah E JoekelInstitute of Parasitology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nikola PantchevIDEXX Laboratories, 70806, Kornwestheim, Germany.
Mindaugas SarkunasLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Veterinary Academy, Tilzes str. 18, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Paul Torgerson *Vetsuisse Faculty, Section of Epidemiology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 270, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Peter Deplazes *Institute of Parasitology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHIDEXX Laboratories (Germany) · DELithuanian University of Health Sciences · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dirofilariosis is a vector-borne disease mainly caused by Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens. In contrast to the known endemicity of dirofilariosis in southern and south-eastern Europe, information on the distribution of D. repens in Central-Europe is fragmentary. We tested 8877 serum samples from dogs from Austria, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Switzerland and the UK using an ELISA detecting filarial-specific antibodies, hypothesising higher occurrence of D. repens. Based on two overlapping frequency distributions, presumed negative samples had a mean optical density (OD) value of 0.097, representing 97.45% of all samples. Presumed positive samples, representing 2.55% of all sera, had a mean OD value of 0.287. Test prevalence based on the calculated cut-off was 3.51% for all sera (4.36% for Austria, 1.94% for Denmark, 1.39% for Germany, 3.37% for Italy, 6.90% for Lithuania, 6.99% for Poland, 0.77% for Switzerland and 0.0% for the UK, respectively). The bimodal distribution, representing overlapping distributions of OD values from positive and negative dogs, enabled the assignment of a probability of true infection status to each dog. Mean probabilities of true infection status across groups, based on the postal codes of origin, allowed us to estimate and map true prevalences. For all countries, except the UK, the true prevalence was lower than the test prevalence. The large number of serum samples and the use of a non-gold standard analytical method allowed us to create a more realistic picture of the distribution of D. repens in Central Europe and the UK.

Indexed as

Dirofilaria immitisDirofilaria repensDirofilariasisDog DiseasesAnimalsDogsEuropePolandPrevalenceUnited KingdomAustriaDenmarkDirofilaria repensDogsFilarial-specific antibodiesGermanyLithuaniaPolandSwitzerlandTrue prevalenceUK

Identifiers

PMID36260253
PMCPMC9653333
OpenAlexW4306755828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.