Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Ru FanZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Watershed Science and Health, College of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.
Jinrong TianZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Watershed Science and Health, College of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.
Huili WangSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, 215009, China.
Xuedong WangSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, 215009, China. zjuwxd@163.com.
Peipei ZhouZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Watershed Science and Health, College of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China. zhoupeipei345@126.com.
Wenzhou Medical University · CNSuzhou University of Science and Technology · CN
Funding
Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 21876125Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 22076134Key Laboratory in Science and Technology Development Project of Suzhou SS202028National Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates 202110343068SNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20211338Zhejiang Provincial Public Benefit Project LGC22B070002Zhejiang Provincial University Student Sci&Tech Innovation Activity Plan and New Seedling Talent Plan 2021R413061
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Sensitive colorimetric assay of hydrogen peroxide and glucose in humoral samples based on the enhanced peroxidase-mimetic activity of NH · full record | OpenQuestion