Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36260178›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Integrating patient-centeredness into online patient-clinician communication: a qualitative analysis of clinicians' secure messaging usage.

Jordan M Alpert, Chelsea N Hampton, Aantaki Raisa, Merry Jennifer Markham, Carma L Bylund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jordan M AlpertCenter for Value-Based Care Research, Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. alpertj@ccf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-4748
Chelsea N HamptonCollege of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, 2093 Weimer Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Aantaki RaisaCollege of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, 2093 Weimer Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Merry Jennifer MarkhamDivision of Hematology & Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Carma L BylundDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient-centered communication (PCC) in cancer care is helpful to nurture the patient-clinician relationship and respond to patients' emotions. However, it is unknown how PCC is incorporated into electronic patient-clinician communication.

methodsIn-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews with clinicians were conducted to understand how PCC was integrated into asynchronous communication between patients and clinicians; otherwise, known as secure messaging. The constant comparative method was used to develop a codebook and formulate themes.

resultsTwenty clinicians in medical and radiation oncology participated in audio-recorded interviews. Three main themes addressed how clinicians incorporate PCC within messages: (1) being mindful of the patient-clinician relationship, (2) encouraging participation and partnership, and (3) responding promptly suggests accessibility and approachability. Clinicians recommended that patients could craft more effective messages by being specific, expressing concern, needs, and directness, summarized by the acronym S.E.N.D.

conclusionsClinicians value secure messaging to connect with patients and demonstrate their accessibility. They acknowledge that secure messaging can influence the patient-clinician relationship and make efforts to include considerate and supportive language. As secure messaging is increasingly relied upon for patient-clinician communication, patients' message quality must improve to assist clinicians in being able to provide prompt responses inclusive of PCC.

Indexed as

CommunicationHumanseHealthPatient-centerednessQualitativeSecure messaging

Identifiers

PMID36260178
PMCPMC9580446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.