Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36260059›Full record

SynthesisActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2023

The content, experiences and outcomes of interventions designed to increase early skin-to-skin contact in high-income settings: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Chloe Moran, Gill Thomson, Victoria Moran, Victoria Fallon

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chloe MoranDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Gill ThomsonMAINN Research Unit, School of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3392-8182
Victoria MoranReader in Maternal & Child Nutrition, MAINN Research Unit, School of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Victoria FallonDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7350-2568
University of Lancashire · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore the content, experiences and outcomes of interventions designed to increase early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) in high-income settings.

methodsA mixed-methods systematic review was undertaken across six bibliographic databases. References of all included studies were hand-searched. All papers were quality appraised using a mixed-method appraisal tool. A narrative synthesis was used to synthesise both quantitative and qualitative findings.

resultsDatabase searches generated 1221 hits, and two studies were identified via hand-searching. Ten studies were included; most (n = 7) were designed to improve SSC following a caesarean section, and half were of low/poor quality. Outcomes related to SSC prevalence and/or duration (n = 7), breastfeeding prevalence, (n = 4) and six explored mothers' and/or health professionals' experiences of the intervention. While the interventions had 'some' impact on the prevalence of SSC, the duration was often limited and not in line with WHO recommendations. Breastfeeding rates (exclusive/any) were found to improve but generally not to a significant extent. Mother and healthcare professionals were positive about the interventions, with barriers to implementation noted. Most interventions targeted healthcare professionals, rather than mothers.

conclusionHigh-quality interventions that increase SSC in line with WHO recommendations, and that target both health professionals and parents are needed.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionMothersBreast FeedingFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansParentsPregnancybreastfeedingexperiencesinterventionskin-to-skinsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36260059
PMCPMC10100171
OpenAlexW4306795468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.