ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2023
Proton pump inhibitors and myocardial infarction: an application of active comparators in a self-controlled case series.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Clinical Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation During Anticoagulation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Drug-Induced Orthostatic Hypotension in UK Primary Care: A Self-Controlled Case Series Study.Clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
- Association Discovery Approach in Healthcare Big Data to Identify Drug Safety and Drug Repurposing Signals.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Performance of the Self-Controlled Case Series With Active Comparators for Drug Safety Signal Detection Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Article
- Risk of Ischaemic Stroke Varies With Antithrombotic Drugs Use in Proton Pump Inhibitor Users: A Self-Controlled Case Series Study.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Article
- Article
- Overcoming time-varying confounding in self-controlled case series with active comparators: application and recommendations.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Core Concepts: Self-Controlled Designs in Pharmacoepidemiology.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Review
- Association between the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Nested Case-Control Study Using a National Health Screening Cohort.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Article
- Adverse Effects Associated with Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors.Chonnam medical journal · 2023Review
- Do Proton Pump Inhibitors Cause Myocardial Infarction and Stroke? Time-Variant Analyses Can Resolve the Debate.American journal of therapeuticsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies investigating potential cardiovascular adverse events of acid-suppressing drugs are susceptible to protopathic bias and confounding. We aimed to investigate the association between short-term risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) using a self-controlled case series (SCCS) with an active comparator.
methodsWe conducted a SCCS using a population-wide database from Hong Kong from 2003-2014. Adult with ≥1 outpatient oral PPI prescription or H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) and MI during the observation period were included. We used both simple ratio and effect modifier approaches to SCCS with active comparators to obtain comparator adjusted estimates.
resultsA total of 2802 and 1889 people with MI who had exposure to PPIs and H2RA were included respectively. We observed a higher risk of MI during days 1-14 following the start of PPI prescription (Incidence rate ratio (IRR): 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76-3.00) versus baseline. Similarly, we observed a higher risk of MI during days 1-14 following the start of H2RA prescription (IRR: 2.46, 95%CI: 1.92-3.16) versus baseline. In the novel SCCS analyses, comparator adjusted estimates were 0.93 (95%CI: 0.57-1.30) and 0.83 (95%CI: 0.58-1.20) during days 1-14 in simple ratio and effect modifier approach, respectively.
conclusionsWe observed no difference in risk of MI associated with PPIs compared with baseline using H2RA as the active comparator. The elevated risk of MI associated with PPIs is likely due to protopathic bias. More studies are required to explore the feasibility of using active comparators in SCCS to address protopathic bias in addition to confounding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.