Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36259933›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2023

Proton pump inhibitors and myocardial infarction: an application of active comparators in a self-controlled case series.

Celine S L Chui, Ka Shing Cheung, Jeremy P Brown, Ian J Douglas, Ian C K Wong, Esther W Chan, Angel Y S Wong

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Core Concepts: Self-Controlled Designs in Pharmacoepidemiology.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Celine S L ChuiSchool of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ka Shing CheungDepartment of Medicine, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jeremy P BrownFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9941-7759
Ian J DouglasFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ian C K WongLaboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Esther W ChanLaboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Angel Y S WongFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation · HKLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/19/19/34175Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies investigating potential cardiovascular adverse events of acid-suppressing drugs are susceptible to protopathic bias and confounding. We aimed to investigate the association between short-term risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) using a self-controlled case series (SCCS) with an active comparator.

methodsWe conducted a SCCS using a population-wide database from Hong Kong from 2003-2014. Adult with ≥1 outpatient oral PPI prescription or H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) and MI during the observation period were included. We used both simple ratio and effect modifier approaches to SCCS with active comparators to obtain comparator adjusted estimates.

resultsA total of 2802 and 1889 people with MI who had exposure to PPIs and H2RA were included respectively. We observed a higher risk of MI during days 1-14 following the start of PPI prescription (Incidence rate ratio (IRR): 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76-3.00) versus baseline. Similarly, we observed a higher risk of MI during days 1-14 following the start of H2RA prescription (IRR: 2.46, 95%CI: 1.92-3.16) versus baseline. In the novel SCCS analyses, comparator adjusted estimates were 0.93 (95%CI: 0.57-1.30) and 0.83 (95%CI: 0.58-1.20) during days 1-14 in simple ratio and effect modifier approach, respectively.

conclusionsWe observed no difference in risk of MI associated with PPIs compared with baseline using H2RA as the active comparator. The elevated risk of MI associated with PPIs is likely due to protopathic bias. More studies are required to explore the feasibility of using active comparators in SCCS to address protopathic bias in addition to confounding.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionProton Pump InhibitorsAdultHistamine H2 AntagonistsHong KongHumansHistamine H2 AntagonistsProton Pump Inhibitorsactive comparatorH2 receptor antagonistProton pump inhibitorsself-controlled case series

Identifiers

PMID36259933
PMCPMC10244046
OpenAlexW4306796198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.