ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2022
Evaluation of a machine learning tool to screen for hypoadrenocorticism in dogs presenting to a teaching hospital.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence and laboratory biomarkers in veterinary medicine: an update about machine learning applications.The veterinary quarterly · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Model for an App-Based Tool to Assist With the Diagnosis of Canine Atopic Dermatitis.Veterinary dermatology · 2026Article
- Predicting the likelihood of hypoadrenocorticism in dogs using signalment and routine laboratory results with an ensemble machine learning predictive model.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Clinical Pathology-An Introduction and Review.Veterinary clinical pathology · 2025Review
- Detection of protein-losing enteropathy (PLE) ultrasonographic imaging features in dogs using deep learning neural networks.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Blood Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Dogs with Portosystemic Shunt.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Veterinarian burnout demographics and organizational impacts: a narrative review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Evaluation of a machine learning tool to screen for hypoadrenocorticism in dogs presenting to a teaching hospital.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDogs with hypoadrenocorticism (HA) have clinical signs and clinicopathologic abnormalities that can be mistaken as other diseases. In dogs with a differential diagnosis of HA, a machine learning model (MLM) has been validated to discriminate between HA and other diseases. This MLM has not been evaluated as a screening tool for a broader group of dogs. HYPOTHESIS: An MLM can accurately screen dogs for HA. ANIMALS: Dogs (n = 1025) examined at a veterinary hospital.
methodsDogs that presented to a tertiary referral hospital that had a CBC and serum chemistry panel were enrolled. A trained MLM was applied to clinicopathologic data and in dogs that were MLM positive for HA, diagnosis was confirmed by measurement of serum cortisol.
resultsTwelve dogs were MLM positive for HA and had further cortisol testing. Five had HA confirmed (true positive), 4 of which were treated for mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid deficiency, and 1 was treated for glucocorticoid deficiency alone. Three MLM positive dogs had baseline cortisol ≤2 μg/dL but were euthanized or administered glucocorticoid treatment without confirming the diagnosis with an ACTH-stimulation test (classified as "undetermined"), and in 4, HA was ruled out (false positives). The positive likelihood ratio of the MLM was 145 to 254. All dogs diagnosed with HA by attending clinicians tested positive by the MLM. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: This MLM can robustly predict HA status when indiscriminately screening all dogs with blood work. In this group of dogs with a low prevalence of HA, the false positive rates were clinically acceptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.