Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36259667›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022

Visuo-tactile heading perception.

Lisa Rosenblum, Alexander Kreß, Jakob C B Schwenk, Frank Bremmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa RosenblumDepartment of Neurophysics, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4155-4029
Alexander KreßDepartment of Neurophysics, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0646-5952
Jakob C B SchwenkDepartment of Neurophysics, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5508-5916
Frank BremmerDepartment of Neurophysics, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1597-7407

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-motion through an environment induces various sensory signals, i.e., visual, vestibular, auditory, or tactile. Numerous studies have investigated the role of visual and vestibular stimulation for the perception of self-motion direction (heading). Here, we investigated the rarely considered interaction of visual and tactile stimuli in heading perception. Participants were presented optic flow simulating forward self-motion across a horizontal ground plane (visual), airflow toward the participants' forehead (tactile), or both. In separate blocks of trials, participants indicated perceived heading from unimodal visual or tactile or bimodal sensory signals. In bimodal trials, presented headings were either spatially congruent or incongruent with a maximum offset between visual and tactile heading of 30°. To investigate the reference frame in which visuo-tactile heading is encoded, we varied head and eye orientation during presentation of the stimuli. Visual and tactile stimuli were designed to achieve comparable precision of heading reports between modalities. Nevertheless, in bimodal trials heading perception was dominated by the visual stimulus. A change of head orientation had no significant effect on perceived heading, whereas, surprisingly, a change in eye orientation affected tactile heading perception. Overall, we conclude that tactile flow is more important to heading perception than previously thought.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionOptic FlowTouch PerceptionVestibule, LabyrinthHumansPhotic StimulationTouchVisual Perceptionheadingmultisensoryself-motionvisuo-tactile

Identifiers

PMID36259667
PMCPMC9722247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.