Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36259633›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2022

Vitrified Particulated Articular Cartilage for Joint Resurfacing: A Swine Model.

Kezhou Wu, Kar Wey Yong, Maha Ead, Mark Sommerfeldt, Tamara D Skene-Arnold, Lindsey Westover, Kajsa Duke, Leila Laouar, Janet A W Elliott, Nadr M Jomha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kezhou WuSports Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4452-2153
Kar Wey YongDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9761-9402
Maha EadDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4647-2009
Mark SommerfeldtDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6462-1680
Tamara D Skene-ArnoldDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2490-4496
Lindsey WestoverDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1220-3967
Kajsa DukeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1549-6227
Leila LaouarDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Janet A W ElliottDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7883-3243
Nadr M JomhaDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1634-0205
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of particulated articular cartilage for repairing cartilage defects has been well established, but its use is currently limited by the availability and short shelf life of donor cartilage. Vitrification is an ice-free cryopreservation technology at ultralow temperatures for tissue banking. An optimized vitrification protocol has been developed for particulated articular cartilage; however, the equivalency of the long-term clinical efficacy of vitrified particulated articular cartilage compared with fresh articular cartilage has not yet been determined. HYPOTHESIS: The repair effect of vitrified particulated cartilage from pigs would be equivalent to or better than that of fresh particulated cartilage stored at 4°C for 21 days. STUDY

designControlled laboratory study.

methodsA total of 19 pigs were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups: fresh particulated cartilage group (n = 8), vitrified particulated cartilage group (n = 8), and negative control group (no particulated cartilage in the defect; n = 3). An additional pig was used as the initial cartilage donor for the first set of surgical procedures. Pigs were euthanized after 6 months to obtain femoral condyles, and the contralateral condyle was used as the positive (no defect) control. Samples were evaluated for gross morphology using the Outerbridge and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) scoring systems, histology (safranin O, collagen type I/II, DAPI), and chondrocyte viability using live-dead membrane integrity staining.

resultsThere were no infections after surgery, and all 19 pigs were followed for the duration of the study. The OARSI grades for the fresh and vitrified particulated cartilage groups were 2.44 ± 1.35 and 2.00 ± 0.80, respectively, while the negative control group was graded significantly higher at 4.83 ± 0.29. Analysis of histological and fluorescent staining demonstrated that the fresh and vitrified particulated cartilage groups had equivalent regeneration within cartilage defects, with similar cell viability and densities and expression of proteoglycans and collagen type I/II.

conclusionThe implantation of fresh or vitrified particulated cartilage resulted in the equivalent repair of focal cartilage defects when evaluated at 6 months after surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The vitrification of particulated cartilage is a viable option for long-term storage for cartilage tissue banking and could greatly increase the availability of donor tissue for transplantation.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesAnimalsChondrocytesCollagen Type ICollagen Type IIKnee JointSwineCollagen Type ICollagen Type IIallograftarticular cartilagearticular cartilage resurfacingbiology of cartilagekneeparticulated cartilagevitrification

Identifiers

PMID36259633
PMCPMC9630855
OpenAlexW4306786670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.