Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36259432›Full record

ArticleCancer2023

Impact of patient choice and hospital competition on patient outcomes after rectal cancer surgery: A national population-based study.

Lu Han, Jemma M Boyle, Kate Walker, Angela Kuryba, Michael S Braun, Nicola Fearnhead, David Jayne, Richard Sullivan, Jan van der Meulen, Ajay Aggarwal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Lu HanDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jemma M BoyleDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8429-957X
Kate WalkerDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Angela KurybaClinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6607-2205
Michael S BraunDepartment of Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Nicola FearnheadDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
David JayneUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Richard SullivanInstitute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, London, UK.
Jan van der MeulenDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ajay AggarwalDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9645-6659
Royal College of Surgeons of England · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research NIHR300599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of the current national cohort study was to analyze the correlation between choice and competition on outcomes after cancer surgery in rectal cancer.

methodsThe analysis included all men who underwent rectal cancer surgery in the English National Health Service between March 2015 and April 2019 (n = 13,996). Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess the effect of a rectal cancer surgery center being located in a competitive environment (based on the number of centers within a threshold distance) and being a successful competitor (based on the ability to attract patients from other hospitals) on eight patient-level outcomes: 30- and 90-day emergency readmissions, 30-day re-operation rates, 90-day postoperative mortality, length of stay >14 days, circumferential resection margin status, rates of primary procedure with a permanent stoma, and rates of persistent stoma 18 months after anterior resection.

resultsWith adjustment for patient characteristics, patients who underwent surgery in centers located in a stronger competitive environment were less likely to have an abdominoperineal excision or a Hartman's procedure (odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.97, p = .04). Additionally, individuals who received treatment at hospitals that were successful competitors had a lower risk of a 90-day readmission following rectal cancer surgery (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.97, p = .03) and were less likely to have a persistent stoma at 18 months after anterior resection (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.93, p = .02).

conclusionsHospitals located in areas of high competition are associated with better patient outcomes and improved processes of care for rectal cancer surgery.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceRectal NeoplasmsCohort StudiesHospitalsHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesState Medicinecancer surgeryhealth care marketshospital competitionpatient choicepatient outcomes

Identifiers

PMID36259432
PMCPMC10092598
OpenAlexW4306782413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.