Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36259428›Full record

Trial reportMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2023

Therapeutic Misestimation in Patients with Degenerative Ataxia: Lessons from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Roderick P P W M Maas, Bart P C van de Warrenburg

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roderick P P W M MaasDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0823-1287
Bart P C van de WarrenburgDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe absence of effective treatments may render patients with degenerative cerebellar ataxias susceptible to a placebo response, which could affect the outcome of clinical trials.

objectiveTo retrospectively examine expectations of benefit in participants of an ataxia trial and identify determinants of possible therapeutic misestimation.

methodsIndividuals with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 who participated in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial received a custom-designed questionnaire about short-term and long-term treatment expectations, allocation preferences, and interpretation of treatment arm assignment based on the presence or absence of clinical improvement. To evaluate whether expectations were specifically related to the application of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or more generally reflect an overly positive attitude of patients with ataxia toward trial participation and results, the last questions involved a hypothetical scenario in which an oral drug was tested against placebo with an aim identical to that of our tDCS study.

resultsAll 20 trial participants completed the questionnaire. If allocated to the active treatment arm, 75% of patients expected short-term health benefits and 55% thought they would still have less severe ataxia at 1-year follow-up compared with baseline. After 2 weeks, an average reduction in ataxia severity of 31.5% (standard deviation, 22.2%) was anticipated. Conversely, 65% associated a lack of improvement with probable or definite allocation to the placebo group. High expectations of benefit were neither related to the type of intervention nor to clinical or demographic characteristics.

conclusionTherapeutic misestimation is common in patients with degenerative ataxia and requires special attention in future trials. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

Cerebellar AtaxiaMovement DisordersTherapeutic MisconceptionTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAtaxiaDouble-Blind MethodHumansRetrospective Studiesdegenerative cerebellar ataxiaexpectations of benefitplacebo effectrandomized controlled trialtherapeutic misconceptiontherapeutic misestimation

Identifiers

PMID36259428
PMCPMC10092424
OpenAlexW4306781222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.