Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36259211›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Genome-wide selection signatures reveal widespread synergistic effects of two different stressors in

Claire Burny, Viola Nolte, Marlies Dolezal, Christian Schlötterer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claire BurnyInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, Vienna 1210, Austria.
Viola NolteInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, Vienna 1210, Austria.
Marlies DolezalPlattform Bioinformatik und Biostatistik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austria.
Christian SchlöttererInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, Vienna 1210, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental evolution combined with whole-genome sequencing (evolve and resequence (E&R)) is a powerful approach to study the adaptive architecture of selected traits. Nevertheless, so far the focus has been on the selective response triggered by a single stressor. Building on the highly parallel selection response of founder populations with reduced variation, we evaluated how the presence of a second stressor affects the genomic selection response. After 20 generations of adaptation to laboratory conditions at either 18°C or 29°C, strong genome-wide selection signatures were observed. Only 38% of the selection signatures can be attributed to laboratory adaptation (no difference between temperature regimes). The remaining selection responses are either caused by temperature-specific effects, or reflect the joint effects of temperature and laboratory adaptation (same direction, but the magnitude differs between temperatures). The allele frequency changes resulting from the combined effects of temperature and laboratory adaptation were more extreme in the hot environment for 83% of the affected genomic regions-indicating widespread synergistic effects of the two stressors. We conclude that E&R with reduced genetic variation is a powerful approach to study genome-wide fitness consequences driven by the combined effects of multiple environmental factors.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterSelection, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsGene FrequencyGenomeDrosophila melanogasterexperimental evolutionlocal adaptationparallel evolutiontemperature adaptation

Identifiers

PMID36259211
PMCPMC9579754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.