ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022
Genome-wide selection signatures reveal widespread synergistic effects of two different stressors in
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- PolyAdapt: Characterizing Polygenic Adaptive Architectures in the Presence of Strong Linkage Disequilibrium.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Linking selection to demography in experimental evolution of active death in a unicellular organism.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Genomics for monitoring and understanding species responses to global climate change.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Non-additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Artificial selection reveals complex genetic architecture of shoot branching and its response to nitrate supply in Arabidopsis.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Genome-wide selection signatures reveal widespread synergistic effects of two different stressors inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experimental evolution combined with whole-genome sequencing (evolve and resequence (E&R)) is a powerful approach to study the adaptive architecture of selected traits. Nevertheless, so far the focus has been on the selective response triggered by a single stressor. Building on the highly parallel selection response of founder populations with reduced variation, we evaluated how the presence of a second stressor affects the genomic selection response. After 20 generations of adaptation to laboratory conditions at either 18°C or 29°C, strong genome-wide selection signatures were observed. Only 38% of the selection signatures can be attributed to laboratory adaptation (no difference between temperature regimes). The remaining selection responses are either caused by temperature-specific effects, or reflect the joint effects of temperature and laboratory adaptation (same direction, but the magnitude differs between temperatures). The allele frequency changes resulting from the combined effects of temperature and laboratory adaptation were more extreme in the hot environment for 83% of the affected genomic regions-indicating widespread synergistic effects of the two stressors. We conclude that E&R with reduced genetic variation is a powerful approach to study genome-wide fitness consequences driven by the combined effects of multiple environmental factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.