Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36259068›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2022

Development and evaluation of a novel training program to build study staff skills in equitable and inclusive engagement, recruitment, and retention of clinical research participants.

Jessica R Cranfill, Stephanie A Freel, Christine E Deeter, Denise C Snyder, Susanna Naggie, Nadine J Barrett, Jamie N Roberts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica R CranfillDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8352-5480
Stephanie A FreelDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8525-3271
Christine E DeeterDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Denise C SnyderDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1160-7433
Susanna NaggieDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Nadine J BarrettSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0439-5209
Jamie N RobertsClinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

Support for QA/QC for Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002553 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JENNIFER S, MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2018 to 2023
$58.5M
Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adequate equitable recruitment of underrepresented groups in clinical research and trials is a national problem and remains a daunting challenge to translating research discoveries into effective healthcare practices. Engagement, recruitment, and retention (ER&R) training programs for Clinical Research Professionals (CRPs) often focus on policies and regulations. Although some training on the importance of diversity and inclusion in clinical research participation has recently been developed, there remains a need for training that couples critical equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) concepts with skill development in effective recruitment and retention strategies, regulations, and best practices. Approach and methods: We developed the ER&R Certificate program as a holistic approach to provide Duke University CRPs the opportunity to build competency in gap areas and to increase comfort in championing equitable partnerships with clinical research participants. The thirteen core and elective courses include blended learning elements, such as e-learning and wiki journaling prompts, to facilitate meaningful discussions. Pre- and post-assessments administered to CRP program participants and their managers assessed program impact on CRP skills in ER&R tasks and comfort in equitable, diverse, and inclusive engagement of clinical research participants. Results and discussion: Results from the first two cohorts indicate that CRPs perceived growth in their own comfort with program learning objectives, especially those centered on participant partnership and EDI principles, and most managers witnessed growth in competence and responsibility for ER&R-related tasks. Results suggest value in offering CRPs robust training programs that integrate EDI and ER&R training.

Indexed as

clinical trialscommunity and stakeholder engagementCTSAdiversityequityhealth disparitiesinclusionrecruitmentResearch participationresearch training programretentionworkforce development

Identifiers

PMID36259068
PMCPMC9556271
OpenAlexW4293576570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.