Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36259050›Full record

ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2022

Factors associated with chronic venous disease: study in 1,136 patients treated for varicose veins of the lower limbs in a specialized clinic.

Martha Ofelia Correa Posada, Laura Maria Contreras Correa, John Fernando García Vélez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martha Ofelia Correa PosadaUniversidad de Antioquia (U de A), Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7895-593X
Laura Maria Contreras CorreaUniversidad CES (U CES), Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9983-5029
John Fernando García VélezUniversidad de Antioquia (U de A), Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-8658-6369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Varicose veins are a highly prevalent condition in the general population, generating variable reasons for consultation that can alter the patient's quality of life, with prevalence and associated factors that vary in different series. Objectives: To describe the epidemiological profile of patients who consulted for varicose veins by evaluating main symptoms and associated variables. Methods: Between 2019 and 2020, 1,136 patients attending vascular surgery consultation in a specialized outpatient center were evaluated. Demographic variables, presented symptoms, complications, and associated factors, such as body mass index, parity and family history, were recorded. Results: A total of 1136 patients were evaluated (79.8% women and 20.2% men), with a mean age of 53.51 years. The presence of symptoms was similar in men and women; the most frequent complications were ulcer, varicorrhage, and superficial venous thrombosis. Most patients showed CEAP 1, 2 and 3 (n = 909) and more than half were overweight or obese (n = 679) with a predominance of those classified as C4. Sixty-nine per cent had a positive family history of varicose veins. There was no difference between severity of varicose veins and time working in the standing or sitting position, but there was a greater presence of C5 or C6 ulcer among patients standing for more than 4 hours. Conclusions: Describing the characteristics of patients with varicose veins helps to understand the disease and to focus efforts towards those who are more susceptible. The results of this research are similar to those found in other populations.

Indexed as

epidemiologyrisk factorsvaricose veins

Identifiers

PMID36259050
PMCPMC9565676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.