Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36259030›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Prognostic Assessment of Interim F18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Esophageal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation With or Without Surgery.

Sophie Lavertu, Maroie Barkati, Sylvain Beaulieu, Jocelyne Martin, Marie-Pierre Campeau, David Donath, David Roberge

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie LavertuRadiation Oncology, Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (CISSS-CA), Lévis, CAN.
Maroie BarkatiRadiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, CAN.
Sylvain BeaulieuNuclear Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) de l'Est-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal, Montréal, CAN.
Jocelyne MartinThoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, CAN.
Marie-Pierre CampeauRadiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, CAN.
David DonathRadiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, CAN.
David RobergeRadiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, CAN.
Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CACentre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de Chaudière-Appalache · CACentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate if the F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F18-FDG PET) response after two weeks of chemoradiation for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer (staged Tumor (T) 3 and/or Nodes (N)+ Metastases (M) 0) was linked to the pathologic response for patients undergoing surgery, to disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS). Materials and Methods Between March 2006 and September 2017, 40 patients were prospectively enrolled in our study, gave written consent, and had PET scans performed before treatment and after two weeks of chemoradiation. One patient did not undergo his two-week PET without informing study coordinators and was excluded from analyses. Results The median age at diagnosis was 62 years. Seventy-two percent of patients had N+ disease. Median OS for the entire group was 24 months. Five-year overall survival was 17%. Survival curves for patients with no PET response, minor PET response, or good PET response overlapped and were not statistically different. For the 25 patients who underwent surgery, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the PET response relative to the pathologic response was 75% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 62%. In study patients, the crude recurrence rate was 68% and there was no correlation between PET response and DFS. Conclusion In our study, interim PET response after two weeks of chemoradiation for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer was not predictive of outcome or pathologic response. Based on our data and current literature, interim PET should not be used to alter treatment (whether to escalate neo-adjuvant treatment or omit surgery).

Indexed as

18fdg-petconcurrent chemoradiation therapylocally advanced esophageal cancermetabolic responseprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36259030
PMCPMC9558932
OpenAlexW4296579852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.