ReviewCureus2022
Robot-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of robotic single-site hysterectomy versus robotic multi-port hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2026Pooled it
- Recent Advances in Gynaecological Care: Diagnostic Innovations, Therapeutic Strategies, and Patient Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Review
- Perioperative outcomes and anesthetic challenges of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- Robotic assisted versus conventional laparoscopic ovarian suture reapproximation in ovarian cystectomy of ovarian endometriomas in preserving ovarian reserve.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Factors Shaping Public Perceptions of a Range of Robotic Technologies in Surgery: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: is there a correlation between uterine diameters, pelvic volume, and surgical outcomes?Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Applications of Deep Learning Models in Laparoscopy for Gynecology.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Anesthesia for robot-assisted surgery: a review.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2025Review
- Trends in adoption of knotless tissue control devices in robotic surgery.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Article
- Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Single-Port Access Laparoscopic and Single-Site Robotic Surgery in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Postmenopausal ovarian hyperandrogenism of surgically treated patients: a case report and scoping review with individual patient's data analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- How does robotic surgery affect gynecology patient care?Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Innovations in Hybrid Laparoscopic Surgery: Integrating Advanced Technologies for Multidisciplinary Cases.Cureus · 2024Review
- Review
- Exploring the Evolution of Robotic Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives.Cureus · 2024Review
- Surgical Frontiers: A Comparative Review of Robotics Versus Laparoscopy in Gynecological Interventions.Cureus · 2023Review
- Robotic Transvaginal Sacrocolpopexy via SHURUI Single-port Snake-arm System.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- On-demand robotic surgery for hysterectomies: A combination of the best of robotic and laparoscopic approach.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advancement of robotics-based procedures in the medical industry is the subject of this review article. The purpose of the surgical robot is to increase surgical abilities and address human shortcomings. The robot's success has been predicated on its ability to accurately and consistently repeat tasks. The following are a few objectives and quantifiable benefits of robotic technology improving surgical maneuverability and physical capabilities. In 2005, the FDA granted gynecological surgery approval for the Da Vinci surgical system. It has been quickly embraced and has already taken on a significant role at many of the locations where it is offered. It consists of a cart with robotic branches next to the patient and a high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) vision system. This study covers laparoscopy via robots in benign gynecological surgeries, myomectomy surgery, hysterectomies, endometriosis, tubal anastomosis, and sacrocolpopexy. The appropriate published studies were evaluated after a PubMed search was conducted. Additionally, procedures that may be used in the future are highlighted. In benign gynecological illness, most currently available research does not show a substantial benefit over traditional laparoscopic surgery. Robotics, however, does provide help in more complicated operations. Compared to laparoscopy, robotic assistance has a lower conversion rate to open procedures. Endo wrist movement of an automated machine during myomectomy surgery can perform proper and better suturing than traditional laparoscopy. The automated program is a noticeable improvement over laparoscopic surgery and, if price issues are resolved, can gain popularity among gynecological surgeons around the globe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.