ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2022
A xenograft study of human adipose stromal cell-based vocal fold mucosal replacement in rabbits.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vocal Outcomes After Cell-Based Outer Vocal Fold Implant in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Safety and Toxicity Evaluation of Stem Cell-Based Vocal Fold Implant in Swine.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Single Platelet Rich Plasma Glottic Injections in Vocal Pathology Demonstrate Long Term Benefits.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Immunocytochemistry assessment of vocal fold regeneration after cell-based implant in rabbits.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
- Cell-Based Outer Vocal Fold Replacement Both Treats and Prevents Vocal Fold Scarring in Rabbits.The Laryngoscope · 2024Article
- Tissue-engineered vocal fold replacement in swine: Methods for functional and structural analysis.PloS one · 2023Article
- A xenograft study of human adipose stromal cell-based vocal fold mucosal replacement in rabbits.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Vocal fold (VF) scarring, manifested by increased collagen, decreased glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), and disrupted elastic fibers, remains a negative consequence of VF injury or resection. The objective of this study is to compare four reconstructive options after Vf mucosal resection in rabbits. A Cell-Based Outer Vocal fold Replacement (COVR) using human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hASCs) in fibrin scaffold is directly compared with a decellularized scaffold implant, hASC injection, and resection alone without reconstruction. The primary hypothesis is that the cells-in-scaffold construct better reconstitutes the VF structure than either cells or scaffold alone, or than healing by secondary intention. Methods: A total of49 rabbits received bilateral VF cordectomy, followed by either COVR implant, decellularized scaffold implant, hASC injection, or no reconstruction (injured control group). Larynges were harvested after 6 weeks. Results: Histology demonstrated greater lamina propria thickness, less collagen deposition, and more GAGs in COVR animals versus all other treatment groups. Evidence of persistent human cells was found in about half of the cell-treated animals. RNA levels of fibrosis pathway and macrophage phenotype markers were statistically unchanged among treatment groups at 6 weeks. Conclusion: These data support the efficacy of COVR implantation in restoring VF microstructure in rabbits. The intact COVR was required; isolated components of decellularized scaffold or injected hASC still produced histologic scarring. We propose that the unique bilayered cell structure within fibrin enables controlled matrix remodeling to minimize wound contraction and fibrosis, and to promote GAG deposition. Level of Evidence: Basic science study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.