Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36258779›Full record

ReviewEthik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin2022

[Feminist perspectives in German-language medical ethics: a review and three hypotheses].

Mirjam Faissner, Kris Vera Hartmann, Isabella Marcinski-Michel, Regina Müller, Merle Weßel

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ethik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mirjam FaissnerKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Präventivmedizin, LWL-Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Alexandrinenstraße 1-3, 44791 Bochum, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0002-9635-7850
Kris Vera HartmannInstitut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0001-7101-9604
Isabella Marcinski-MichelInstitut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0001-6178-5495
Regina MüllerInstitut für Philosophie, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0001-6821-6770
Merle WeßelEthik in der Medizin, Department Versorgungsforschung, Fakultät VI Medizin und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0001-7508-2934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Definition of the problem: Feminist approaches to medical ethics are well established in international discourses. By contrast, in the German-speaking medical ethical discourse, they still seem to be rather marginal. In this article, we analyze which feminist perspectives are prominent in German medical ethics and suggest new approaches. Arguments: We present our results from a systematized review of the literature, in which we identify existing feminist approaches within the German-speaking medical ethics discourse as well as research gaps. Based on the review, our preliminary research and discussions in the working group "Feminist perspectives in bio and medical ethics", we defend three hypotheses aimed at advancing the German feminist medical ethical discourse. We posit that (1) feminist medical ethics aim at (epistemic) justice, (2) feminist medical ethics are critical and context-sensitive, and (3) intersectional and postcolonial approaches within feminist medical ethics may contribute to epistemically just, critical, and context-sensitive medical ethics. Conclusion: We argue that feminist perspectives should be implemented as a fundamental perspective in medical ethics because they can bring together key dimensions such as epistemically just, critical, context-sensitive, intersectional, and postcolonial thinking.

Indexed as

DiscriminationFeminismGenderIntersectionalityJusticeLiterature review

Identifiers

PMID36258779
PMCPMC9559163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.