Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36258309›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2023

Challenges and opportunities in creating a deprescribing program in the emergency department: A qualitative study.

Sangil Lee, Morgan Bobb Swanson, Allison Fillman, Ryan M Carnahan, Aaron T Seaman, Heather Schacht Reisinger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Attitudes Toward Deprescribing Among Older Adults Seeking Care in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Navigating Medication Risk in the ED: Communication Preferences of Older Adults Regarding Deprescribing.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sangil LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8529-4500
Morgan Bobb SwansonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Allison FillmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Ryan M CarnahanDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Aaron T SeamanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1680-1334
Heather Schacht ReisingerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
University of Iowa · US

Funding

CCOM innovation grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the population of older adults increases, appropriate deprescribing becomes increasingly important for emergency geriatric care. Older adults represent the sickest patients with chronic medical conditions, and they are often exposed to high-risk medications. We need to provide an evidence-based, standardized deprescribing program in the acute care setting, yet the evidence base is lacking and standardized medication programs are needed.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study with the goal to understand the perspective of healthcare workers, patients, and caregivers on deprescribing high-risk medications in the context of emergency care practices, provider preferences, and practice variability, along with the facilitators and barriers to an effective deprescribing program in the emergency department (ED). To ensure rich, contextual data, the study utilized two qualitative methods: (1) a focus group with physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, pharmacists, and geriatricians involved in care of older adults and their prescriptions in the acute care setting; (2) semi-structured interviews with patients and caregivers involved in treatment and emergency care. Transcriptions were coded using thematic content analysis, and the principal investigator (S.L.) and trained research staff categorized each code into themes.

resultsData collection from a focus group with healthcare workers (n = 8) and semi-structured interviews with patients and caregivers (n = 20) provided evidence of a potentially promising ED medication program, aligned with the vision of comprehensive care of older adults, that can be used to evaluate practices and develop interventions. We identified four themes: (1) Challenges in medication history taking, (2) missed opportunities in identifying high-risk medications, (3) facilitators and barriers to deprescribing recommendations, and (4) how to coordinate deprescribing recommendations.

conclusionsOur focus group and semi-structured interviews resulted in a framework for an ED medication program to screen, identify, and deprescribe high-risk medications for older adults and coordinate their care with primary care providers.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsPhysiciansAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFocus GroupsHumansQualitative Researchdeprescribingfocus grouphigh-risk medicationsemi-structured interview

Identifiers

PMID36258309
PMCPMC10092723
OpenAlexW4306756957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.