Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36258223›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

StOP? II trial: cluster randomized clinical trial to test the implementation of a toolbox for structured communication in the operating room-study protocol.

Sandra Keller, Franziska Tschan, Norbert K Semmer, Sven Trelle, Tanja Manser, Guido Beldi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05356962 (STOP? II Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05356962 narecruitingnot on this map

STOP? II Trial: Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial to Test the Implementation of a Toolbox for Structured Communication in the Operating Room

TypeinterventionalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2022 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsCommunication Research, Communication, MultidisciplinaryArmsStOP?-protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. When do they StOP?: A first step toward automatically identifying team communication in the operating room.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra KellerDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Franziska TschanInstitute for Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Norbert K SemmerDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sven TrelleCTU Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Tanja ManserFHNW School of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, Switzerland.
Guido BeldiDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. guido.beldi@insel.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-3807
University of Bern · CHFHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts · CHUniversity of Neuchâtel · CH

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 198795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical care, which is performed by intensely interacting multidisciplinary teams of surgeons, anesthetists, and nurses, remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Intraoperative communication has been shown to be associated with surgical outcomes, but tools ensuring efficient intraoperative communication are lacking. In a previous study, we developed the StOP?-protocol that fosters structured intraoperative communication. Before the critical phases of the operation, the responsible surgeon initiates and leads one or several StOP?s. During a StOP?, the surgeon informs about the progress of the operation (status), next steps and proximal goals (objectives), and possible problems (problems) and encourages all team members to voice their observations and ask questions (?). In a before-after study performed mainly in visceral surgery, we found effects of the StOP?-protocol on mortality, length of hospital stay, and reoperation. We intend to assess the impact of the StOP?-protocol in a cluster randomized trial, in a wider variety of surgical specialties (i.e., general, visceral, thoracic, vascular surgery, surgical urology, and gynecology). The primary hypothesis is that the consistent use of the StOP?-protocol by the main surgeon reduces patient mortality within 30 days after the operation. The secondary hypothesis is that the consistent use of the StOP?-protocol by the main surgeon reduces unplanned reoperations, length of hospital stay, and unplanned hospital readmissions.

methodsThis study is designed as a multicenter, cluster-randomized parallel-group trial. Board-certified surgeons of participating clinical departments will be randomized 1:1 to the StOP? intervention group or to the standard of care (control) group. The intervention group will undergo a training to use the StOP?-protocol and receive regular feedback on their compliance with the protocol. The surgeons in the control group will communicate as usual during their operations. The unit of observation will be operations performed by cluster surgeons. Consecutive patients will be enrolled over 4 months per cluster. A total of 400 surgeons will be recruited, and we expect to collect patient outcome data for 14,000 surgical procedures. DISCUSSION: The StOP?-protocol was designed as a tool to structure communication during surgical procedures. Testing its effects on patient outcomes will contribute to implementing evidenced-based interventions to reduce surgical complications.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05356962. Registered on May 2, 2022.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2CommunicationHumansLength of StayMulticenter Studies as TopicOperating RoomsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBriefingChecklistCluster randomized controlled trialCommunicationCoordinationMortalityOperating roomPost-operative complicationsTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID36258223
PMCPMC9580155
OpenAlexW4306750379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.