Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36258219›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Experiences of the Data Monitoring Committee for the RECOVERY trial, a large-scale adaptive platform randomised trial of treatments for patients hospitalised with COVID-19.

Peter A G Sandercock, Janet Darbyshire, David DeMets, Robert Fowler, David G Lalloo, Mohammed Munavvar, Natalie Staplin, Adilia Warris, Janet Wittes, Jonathan R Emberson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ADDIS-Graphs for Online Error Control With Application to Platform Trials.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Peter A G SandercockCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Janet DarbyshireUniversity College London, London, UK.
David DeMetsSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.
Robert FowlerDepartment of Medicine and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
David G LallooLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Mohammed MunavvarLancashire Teaching Hospitals and University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Natalie StaplinMedical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Adilia WarrisMRC Centre for Medical Mycology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Janet WittesWittes LLC, Washington D.C., USA.
Jonathan R EmbersonMedical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. jonathan.emberson@ndph.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7792-9422
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBPopulation Council · INUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19056Medical Research Council MC_PC_21051Medical Research Council MC_UU_00017/3Medical Research Council MR/V033417/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo inform the oversight of future clinical trials during a pandemic, we summarise the experiences of the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) for the Randomised Evaluation of COVID therapy trial (RECOVERY), a large-scale randomised adaptive platform clinical trial of treatments for hospitalised patients with COVID-19. METHODS AND

findingsDuring the first 24 months of the trial (March 2020 to February 2022), the DMC oversaw accumulating data for 14 treatments in adults (plus 10 in children) involving > 45,000 randomised patients. Five trial aspects key for the DMC in performing its role were: a large committee of members, including some with extensive DMC experience and others who had broad clinical expertise; clear strategic planning, communication, and responsiveness by the trial principal investigators; data collection and analysis systems able to cope with phases of very rapid recruitment and link to electronic health records; an ability to work constructively with regulators (and other DMCs) to address emerging concerns without the need to release unblinded mortality results; and the use of videoconferencing systems that enabled national and international members to meet at short notice and from home during the pandemic when physical meetings were impossible. Challenges included that the first four treatments introduced were effectively 'competing' for patients (increasing pressure to make rapid decisions on each one); balancing the global health imperative to report on findings with the need to maintain confidentiality until the results were sufficiently certain to appropriately inform treatment decisions; and reliably assessing safety, especially for newer agents introduced after the initial wave and in the small numbers of pregnant women and children included. We present a series of case vignettes to illustrate some of the issues and the DMC decision-making related to hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, casirivimab + imdevimab, and tocilizumab.

conclusionsRECOVERY's streamlined adaptive platform design, linked to hospital-level and population-level health data, enabled the rapid and reliable assessment of multiple treatments for hospitalised patients with COVID-19. The later introduction of factorial assessments increased the trial's efficiency, without compromising the DMC's ability to assess safety and efficacy. Requests for the release of unblinded primary outcome data to regulators at points when data were not mature required significant efforts in communication with the regulators by the DMC to avoid inappropriate early trial termination.

Indexed as

COVID-19Adaptive Clinical Trials as TopicAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChildClinical Trials Data Monitoring CommitteesDexamethasoneFemaleHumansHydroxychloroquinePregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedcasirivimabDexamethasoneHydroxychloroquineimdevimab

Identifiers

PMID36258219
PMCPMC9579551
OpenAlexW4306734901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.