ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022
Identification of miRNA biomarkers for breast cancer by combining ensemble regularized multinomial logistic regression and Cox regression.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- MicroRNAs in breast cancer-new frontiers in diagnosis, targeted therapy, and prognosis assessment.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- miR-125 in Breast Cancer Etiopathogenesis: An Emerging Role as a Biomarker in Differential Diagnosis, Regenerative Medicine, and the Challenges of Personalized Medicine.Non-coding RNA · 2024Review
- NBAT1/miR-21 axis in progression of colorectal cancer and impact of PVT-1 polymorphism on miR-145 expression level and its clinical significance.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2024Article
- A Deep Differential Analysis in Four Subtypes of Breast Cancer Based on Regulations of miRNA-mRNA.IET systems biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women. It is necessary to classify breast cancer subtypes because different subtypes need specific treatment. Identifying biomarkers and classifying breast cancer subtypes is essential for developing appropriate treatment methods for patients. MiRNAs can be easily detected in tumor biopsy and play an inhibitory or promoting role in breast cancer, which are considered promising biomarkers for distinguishing subtypes.
resultsA new method combing ensemble regularized multinomial logistic regression and Cox regression was proposed for identifying miRNA biomarkers in breast cancer. After adopting stratified sampling and bootstrap sampling, the most suitable sample subset for miRNA feature screening was determined via ensemble 100 regularized multinomial logistic regression models. 124 miRNAs that participated in the classification of at least 3 subtypes and appeared at least 50 times in 100 integrations were screened as features. 22 miRNAs from the proposed feature set were further identified as the biomarkers for breast cancer by using Cox regression based on survival analysis. The accuracy of 5 methods on the proposed feature set was significantly higher than on the other two feature sets. The results of 7 biological analyses illustrated the rationality of the identified biomarkers.
conclusionsThe screened features can better distinguish breast cancer subtypes. Notably, the genes and proteins related to the proposed 22 miRNAs were considered oncogenes or inhibitors of breast cancer. 9 of the 22 miRNAs have been proved to be markers of breast cancer. Therefore, our results can be considered in future related research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.