Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36258045›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2023

Remote dielectric sensing and lung ultrasound to assess pulmonary congestion.

Toshihide Izumida, Teruhiko Imamura, Koichiro Kinugawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Toshihide IzumidaSecond Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani Toyama, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Teruhiko ImamuraSecond Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani Toyama, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan. teimamu@med.u-toyama.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7294-7637
Koichiro KinugawaSecond Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani Toyama, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the agreement between remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) system, which is a recently introduced non-invasive technology to quantify the degree of pulmonary congestion, and lung ultrasound (LUS), which is a gold standard to assess the existence of severe pulmonary congestion. Consecutive patients who were hospitalized to examine the cause of heart failure and treat their heart failure in our institute were prospectively included. They received LUS and simultaneous ReDS measurements. Three or more B-lines at each LUS zone was assigned to B-profile positive, indicating the existence of significant pulmonary congestion. ReDS values ≥ 35% were defined as significant pulmonary congestion. A total of 19 heart failure patients were included (77 years, 13 men). Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level was 131 (36, 416) pg/ml. Three patients had B-profile, indicating significant pulmonary congestion, and two of them had ≥ 35% of ReDS (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 87.5%, and negative predictive value 93.3%). Most of the patients (79%) had lower B-lines below 3 and did not satisfy the criteria of B-profile, irrespective of wide ranges of ReDS values. ReDS system had as acceptable predictability as LUS in assessing the existence of significant pulmonary congestion. ReDS would be recommended to rule out significant pulmonary congestion or quantify the degree of less significant pulmonary congestion.

Indexed as

Heart FailurePulmonary EdemaHumansLungMalePredictive Value of TestsUltrasonographyCardiologyDiagnosisHeart failurePulmonary edema

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.