ArticleHeart and vessels2023
Remote dielectric sensing and lung ultrasound to assess pulmonary congestion.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote dielectric sensing for pulmonary congestion assessment: current concepts and clinical perspectives.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Association between lung fluid levels estimated by remote dielectric sensing and lung ultrasound in patients with heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- How to Incorporate Remote Dielectric Sensing System and Lung Ultrasound in Patients with Acute Congestive Heart FailureReply.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Assessment of Pulmonary Congestion According to Ultrasound and Remote Dielectric Sensing (ReDS) in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Article
- Prognostic impact of residual pulmonary congestion assessed by remote dielectric sensing system in patients admitted for heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Prognostic impact of remote dielectric sensing value following TAVR.Heart and vessels · 2023Article
- Presence of Pleural Effusion in the Assessment of Remote Dielectric Sensing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Correlation between Remote Dielectric Sensing and Chest X-Ray to Assess Pulmonary Congestion.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Association between Remote Dielectric Sensing and Estimated Plasma Volume to Assess Body Fluid Distribution.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Noninvasive assessment of pulmonary congestion in heart failure: Need of the hour.Indian heart journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the agreement between remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) system, which is a recently introduced non-invasive technology to quantify the degree of pulmonary congestion, and lung ultrasound (LUS), which is a gold standard to assess the existence of severe pulmonary congestion. Consecutive patients who were hospitalized to examine the cause of heart failure and treat their heart failure in our institute were prospectively included. They received LUS and simultaneous ReDS measurements. Three or more B-lines at each LUS zone was assigned to B-profile positive, indicating the existence of significant pulmonary congestion. ReDS values ≥ 35% were defined as significant pulmonary congestion. A total of 19 heart failure patients were included (77 years, 13 men). Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level was 131 (36, 416) pg/ml. Three patients had B-profile, indicating significant pulmonary congestion, and two of them had ≥ 35% of ReDS (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 87.5%, and negative predictive value 93.3%). Most of the patients (79%) had lower B-lines below 3 and did not satisfy the criteria of B-profile, irrespective of wide ranges of ReDS values. ReDS system had as acceptable predictability as LUS in assessing the existence of significant pulmonary congestion. ReDS would be recommended to rule out significant pulmonary congestion or quantify the degree of less significant pulmonary congestion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36258045What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.