Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36258009›Full record

GuidelineEye (London, England)2023

Clinical assessment, investigation, diagnosis and initial management of cerebral visual impairment: a consensus practice guide.

Rachel Fiona Pilling, Louise Allen, Richard Bowman, John Ravenscroft, Kathryn J Saunders, Cathy Williams

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07275021 (The Vision Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07275021 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Vision Study: Cerebral/ Cortical Visual Impairment (CVI)

TypeobservationalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2025 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsPreterm Less Than 32wks With IVH, WMI/PVL, Late Preterm or Term (37-42wks) With Neonatal Encephalopathy Treated With Hypothermia for HIEArmsProspective Clinical and Neurodevelopmental Data Collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel Fiona PillingUniversity of Bradford, Bradford, England. r.f.pilling@bradford.ac.uk.
Louise AllenUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, England.ORCID 0000-0002-7623-9435
Richard BowmanGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, England.
John RavenscroftUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Kathryn J SaundersUlster University, Coleraine, UK.
Cathy WilliamsUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, England.
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity of Bradford · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVI) is a common condition in the UK. Patients with conditions associated with CVI are frequently seen in paediatric ophthalmology clinics offering eye care professionals an opportunity to identify children proactively. In most cases CVI occurs as part of a neurodevelopmental condition or as a feature of multiple and complex disabilities. However, CVI can also be seen in children with apparently typical development. In some cases, high contrast visual acuity is normal and in other cases severely impaired. As such, identification of CVI requires evaluation of aspects of visual performance beyond high contrast acuity and consideration that visual function of those with CVI may fluctuate. Few paediatric ophthalmologists have received formal training in CVI. The detection and diagnosis of CVI varies across the UK and patients report hugely different experiences. A diagnosis of CVI is made based on professional clinical judgement and it is recognised that individual perspectives and local practice in the specific methodologies of assessment will vary. A systematic review and survey of professionals is underway to attempt to reach agreement on diagnostic criteria. Nonetheless, established pathways and published protocols can offer guidance on how a paediatric ophthalmology service can approach assessment of the child with suspected CVI. The purpose of this paper is to present a summary of research and clinical practice methods for detecting and diagnosing CVI in a paediatric ophthalmology outpatient setting. It represents current understanding of the topic and acknowledges the evolving nature of both practice and the evidence-base. A rapid literature review was undertaken to identify articles relating to clinical investigation of children with CVI. A focus group of QTVI and subject matter experts from sight loss charities was undertaken to address areas which were not covered by the literature review.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyVision DisordersBlindnessChildConsensusHumansVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID36258009
PMCPMC10333179
OpenAlexW4306696374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.