Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36258002›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Gastrojejunostomy versus endoscopic duodenal stent placement for gastric outlet obstruction in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Takashi Tamura, Takenaka Mamoru, Taichi Terai, Takeshi Ogura, Masaji Tani, Toshio Shimokawa, Yuji Kitahata, Ippei Matsumoto, Akira Mitoro, Mitsuhiro Asakuma and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Takashi TamuraSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1, Kimiidera, Wakayama city, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan.
Takenaka MamoruDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-sayama, Japan.
Taichi TeraiDepartment of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Takeshi OguraSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan.
Masaji TaniDepartment of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Toshio ShimokawaClinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama, Japan.
Yuji KitahataSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Ippei MatsumotoDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-sayama, Japan.
Akira MitoroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Mitsuhiro AsakumaDepartment of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan.
Osamu InatomiDepartment of Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Shunsuke OmotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-sayama, Japan.
Masayuki ShoDepartment of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Saori UenoSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan.
Hiromitsu MaehiraDepartment of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Masayuki KitanoSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1, Kimiidera, Wakayama city, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan. kitano@wakayama-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6885-9223
Wakayama Medical University · JPKindai University · JPNara Medical University · JPOsaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JPShiga University of Medical Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatments for patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) due to unresectable pancreatic cancers (URPC) include gastrojejunostomy (GJJ) and endoscopic duodenal stent placement (EDSP). This study compared the efficacy and safety of GJJ and EDSP in patients with GOO due to URPC.

methodsThis study retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with GOO due to URPC who underwent GJJ or EDSP between April 2016 and March 2020. The efficacy and safety of GJJ and EDSP were compared with propensity score analysis. Subgroup analyses of overall survival (OS) were compared after propensity matching.

resultsData were obtained from 54 patients who underwent GJJ and from 73 who underwent EDSP at five tertiary care hospitals. After propensity matching, OS was significantly longer in patients who underwent GJJ than EDSP (110 vs. 63 days, respectively; p = 0.019). Evaluation of long-term adverse events showed that the frequency of cholangitis and obstructive jaundice was significantly lower in the matched GJJ than in the matched EDSP group (p = 0.012). Subgroup analyses showed that OS in patients with good performance status (PS; p = 0.041), biliary obstruction (p = 0.007), and duodenal obstruction near the papilla (p = 0.027), and those receiving chemotherapy (p = 0.010), was significantly longer in the matched GJJ group than in matched EDSP group.

conclusionGJJ provides longer OS than EDSP for patients with GOO caused by URPC, especially for patients with good PS, biliary obstruction, and duodenal obstruction near the papilla, and those receiving chemotherapy.

Indexed as

CholestasisDuodenal ObstructionGastric BypassGastric Outlet ObstructionPancreatic NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsHumansPalliative CarePropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeBiliary obstructionEndoscopic duodenal stent placementGastric outlet obstructionGastrojejunostomyUnresectable pancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID36258002
OpenAlexW4306717716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.