ReviewDNA repair2022
Transgenic mice harboring direct repeat substrates reveal key underlying causes of homologous recombination in vivo.
Review in DNA repair, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Homology directed repair is a critical process for maintaining the genome of mammalian cells. While considered to be relatively error free, homologous recombination (HR) can lead to insertions, deletions, translocations, and loss of heterozygosity. Furthermore, it is known that conditions that cause HR events are often carcinogenic, and that HR modulates susceptibility to cancer chemotherapeutics, making HR relevant to both cancer etiology and treatment. To learn about HR in vivo, several laboratories have developed mouse models that harbor direct repeat substrates for which HR yields a phenotype that can be visualized by either a change in pigmentation or by expression of a fluorescent protein. An exciting aspect of this work is that it is possible to detect recombinant cells within intact tissues and thus learn about how physiological changes, genes, and exposures modulate HR susceptibility in vivo, as well as which cell types are most susceptible to HR, and the extent to which recombinant cells have undergone clonal expansion. Here, we review progress in studying HR in vivo for four different mouse strains that harbor direct repeat substrates for HR detection, namely the p
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.