Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36257132›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2023

Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view.

Veronika A Zimmer, Alberto Gomez, Emily Skelton, Robert Wright, Gavin Wheeler, Shujie Deng, Nooshin Ghavami, Karen Lloyd, Jacqueline Matthew, Bernhard Kainz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Automated multivolume placental reconstruction using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound and infrared camera tracking.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  8. PRISM Lite: A lightweight model for interactive 3D placenta segmentation in ultrasound.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  9. Frontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Deep learning based automatic segmentation of the placenta and uterine cavity on prenatal MR images.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Veronika A ZimmerSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Germany. Electronic address: vam.zimmer@gmail.com.
Alberto GomezSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Emily SkeltonSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Robert WrightSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gavin WheelerSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Shujie DengSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nooshin GhavamiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Karen LloydSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jacqueline MatthewSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bernhard KainzBioMedIA group, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
Daniel RueckertFaculty of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Germany; BioMedIA group, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joseph V HajnalSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Julia A SchnabelSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Germany; Helmholtz Center Munich, Germany.

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome Trust 102431Wellcome Trust 203148Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic segmentation of the placenta in fetal ultrasound (US) is challenging due to the (i) high diversity of placenta appearance, (ii) the restricted quality in US resulting in highly variable reference annotations, and (iii) the limited field-of-view of US prohibiting whole placenta assessment at late gestation. In this work, we address these three challenges with a multi-task learning approach that combines the classification of placental location (e.g., anterior, posterior) and semantic placenta segmentation in a single convolutional neural network. Through the classification task the model can learn from larger and more diverse datasets while improving the accuracy of the segmentation task in particular in limited training set conditions. With this approach we investigate the variability in annotations from multiple raters and show that our automatic segmentations (Dice of 0.86 for anterior and 0.83 for posterior placentas) achieve human-level performance as compared to intra- and inter-observer variability. Lastly, our approach can deliver whole placenta segmentation using a multi-view US acquisition pipeline consisting of three stages: multi-probe image acquisition, image fusion and image segmentation. This results in high quality segmentation of larger structures such as the placenta in US with reduced image artifacts which are beyond the field-of-view of single probes.

Indexed as

PlacentaFemaleHumansPregnancyMulti-task learningMulti-view imagingUltrasound placenta segmentationUncertainty/variability

Identifiers

PMID36257132
PMCPMC7614009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.