ArticlePlacenta2022
The key role of examining the placenta in establishing a probable cause for stillbirth.
Article in Placenta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stillbirth in Iceland 1996-2021: Incidence and etiology.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Placental lesions in stillbirths: A case-control study using the Amsterdam criteria and predictive models at a UK tertiary unit.PloS one · 2025Article
- Association of Placental Histology with the Pulsatility Index of Fetal and Uteroplacental Vessels during Pregnancy and with Birthweight Z-Score.Medical research archives · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAutopsy is regarded as the "gold standard" to determine probable causes of stillbirths. However, autopsy is expensive and not readily available in low- and middle-income countries. Therefore, we assessed how the clinical cause of death is modified by adding placental histology and autopsy findings.
methodData from the Safe Passage Study was used where 7060 pregnant women were followed prospectively. Following a stillbirth, each case was discussed and classified at weekly perinatal mortality meetings. This classification was later adapted to the WHO ICD PM system. Clinical information was presented first, and a possible cause of death decided upon and noted. The placental histology was then presented and, again, a possible cause of death, using the placental and clinical information, was decided upon and noted, followed by autopsy information. Diagnoses were then compared to determine how often the additional information changed the initial clinical findings.
resultsClinical information, placental histology, and autopsy results were available in 47 stillbirths. There were major amendments from the clinical only diagnoses when placental histology was added. Forty cases were classified as due to M1: complications of placenta, cord, and membranes, when placental histology was added compared to 7 cases with clinical classification only, and M5: No maternal condition identified decreased from 30 cases to 3 cases. Autopsy findings confirmed the clinical and placental histology findings. DISCUSSION: Clinical information together with examination of the placenta revealed sufficient information to diagnose the most probable cause of death in 40 of 47 cases of stillbirth (85%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.