Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36256834›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Readiness for Telemedical Services in Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases: Cross-sectional Study.

Barbara Kalańska-Łukasik, Aleksandra Gładyś, Tomasz Jadczyk, Monika Gruz-Kwapisz, Wojciech Wojakowski, Malgorzata Kowalska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Barbara Kalańska-ŁukasikDepartment of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0934-7110
Aleksandra GładyśDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5626-9960
Tomasz JadczykDepartment of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7955-9100
Monika Gruz-KwapiszDepartment of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8809-7182
Wojciech WojakowskiDepartment of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3681-5207
Malgorzata KowalskaDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9386-0346
Medical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemedicine solutions, especially in the face of epidemiological emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic, played an important role in the remote communication between patients and medical providers. However, the implementation of modern technologies should rely on patients' readiness toward new services to enable effective cooperation with the physician. Thus, successful application of patient-centric telehealth services requires an in-depth analysis of users' expectations.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate factors determining readiness for using telehealth solutions among patients with cardiovascular diseases.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study based on an investigator-designed, validated questionnaire that included 19 items (demographics, health status, medical history, previous health care experience, expected telehealth functionalities, and preferred remote communication methods). Multivariate logistic regression was applied to assess the relationship between readiness and their determinants.

resultsOf the 249 respondents, 83.9% (n=209) consented to the use of telemedicine to contact a cardiologist. The nonacceptance of using telemedicine was 2 times more frequent in rural dwellers (odds ratio [OR] 2.411, 95% CI 1.003-5.796) and patients without access to the internet (OR 2.432, 95% CI 1.022-5.786). In comparison to participants living in rural areas, city dwellers demonstrated a higher willingness to use telemedicine, including following solutions: issuing e-prescriptions (19/31, 61.3% vs 141/177, 79.7%; P=.02); alarming at the deterioration of health (18/31, 58.1% vs 135/177, 76.3%; P=.03); and arranging or canceling medical visits (16/31, 51.6% vs 126/176, 71.6%; P=.03). Contact by mobile phone was preferred by younger patients (OR 2.256, 95% CI 1.058-4.814), whereas older patients and individuals who had no previous difficulties in accessing physicians preferred landline phone communication.

conclusionsDuring a nonpandemic state, 83.9% of patients with cardiovascular diseases declared readiness to use telemedicine solutions.

Indexed as

acceptancepatient-cardiologist contactreadinesstelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36256834
PMCPMC11042508
OpenAlexW4285362885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.