Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36256645›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Analytical and clinical validation of a custom 15-gene next-generation sequencing panel for the evaluation of circulating tumor DNA mutations in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Yock Ping Chow, Norziha Zainul Abidin, Ken Siong Kow, Lye Mun Tho, Chieh Lee Wong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for identifying actionable mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yock Ping ChowClinical Research Centre, Sunway Medical Centre, Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Norziha Zainul AbidinMolecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Sunway Medical Centre, Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Ken Siong KowDepartment of Medicine, Sunway Medical Centre, Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Lye Mun ThoDepartment of Medicine, Sunway Medical Centre, Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Chieh Lee WongClinical Research Centre, Sunway Medical Centre, Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-4919-5825
Sunway University · MYHammersmith Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is a pilot proof-of-concept study to evaluate the utility of a custom 15-gene circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) panel as a potential companion molecular next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay for identifying somatic single nucleotide variants and indels in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The custom panel covers the hotspot mutations in EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, ERBB2, MET, KIT, PDGFRA, ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 genes which serve as biomarkers for guiding treatment decisions in NSCLC patients.

methodThe custom 15-gene ctDNA NGS panel was designed using ArcherDX Assay Designer. A total of 20 ng or 50 ng input ctDNA was used to construct the libraries. The analytical performance was evaluated using reference standards at different allellic frequencies (0.1%, 1%, 5% and parental). The clinical performance was evaluated using plasma samples collected from 10 treatment naïve advanced stage III or IV NSCLC patients who were tested for tissue EGFR mutations. The bioinformatics analysis was performed using the proprietary Archer Analysis Software.

resultsFor the analytical validation, we achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity for the detection of known mutations in the reference standards. The limit of detection was 1% allelic frequency. Clinical validation showed that the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the assay for detecting EGFR mutation were 83.3% and 100% respectively. In addition, the NGS panel also detected other mutations of uncertain significance in 6 out of 10 patients.

conclusionThis preliminary analysis showed that the custom 15-gene ctDNA NGS panel demonstrated good analytical and clinical performances for the EGFR mutation. Further studies incorporating the validation of other candidate gene mutations are warranted.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCirculating Tumor DNALung NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationNucleotidesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesNucleotidesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID36256645
PMCPMC9578623
OpenAlexW4306731961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.