Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36256637›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Data augmentation based on multiple oversampling fusion for medical image segmentation.

Liangsheng Wu, Jiajun Zhuang, Weizhao Chen, Yu Tang, Chaojun Hou, Chentong Li, Zhenyu Zhong, Shaoming Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liangsheng WuAcademy of Interdisciplinary Studies, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiajun ZhuangAcademy of Contemporary Agriculture Engineering Innovations, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China.
Weizhao ChenAcademy of Interdisciplinary Studies, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu TangAcademy of Interdisciplinary Studies, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9221-6591
Chaojun HouAcademy of Contemporary Agriculture Engineering Innovations, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China.
Chentong LiInstitute of Intelligent Manufacturing, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenyu ZhongInstitute of Intelligent Manufacturing, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Shaoming LuoAcademy of Interdisciplinary Studies, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Academy of Sciences · CNGuangdong Polytechnic Normal University · CNZhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A high-performance medical image segmentation model based on deep learning depends on the availability of large amounts of annotated training data. However, it is not trivial to obtain sufficient annotated medical images. Generally, the small size of most tissue lesions, e.g., pulmonary nodules and liver tumours, could worsen the class imbalance problem in medical image segmentation. In this study, we propose a multidimensional data augmentation method combining affine transform and random oversampling. The training data is first expanded by affine transformation combined with random oversampling to improve the prior data distribution of small objects and the diversity of samples. Secondly, class weight balancing is used to avoid having biased networks since the number of background pixels is much higher than the lesion pixels. The class imbalance problem is solved by utilizing weighted cross-entropy loss function during the training of the CNN model. The LUNA16 and LiTS17 datasets were introduced to evaluate the performance of our works, where four deep neural network models, Mask-RCNN, U-Net, SegNet and DeepLabv3+, were adopted for small tissue lesion segmentation in CT images. In addition, the small tissue segmentation performance of the four different deep learning architectures on both datasets could be greatly improved by incorporating the data augmentation strategy. The best pixelwise segmentation performance for both pulmonary nodules and liver tumours was obtained by the Mask-RCNN model, with DSC values of 0.829 and 0.879, respectively, which were similar to those of state-of-the-art methods.

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID36256637
PMCPMC9578635
OpenAlexW4306733962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.