ArticleJAMA network open2022
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Bacterial and Viral Biomarker Point-of-Care Test in the Outpatient Setting.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02018198 (DIStinguish Respiratory Underlying Pathogen associaTed Host Response in Acute Respiratory Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
DIStinguish Respiratory Underlying Pathogen associaTed Host Response in Acute Respiratory Infection: An Evaluation of FebriDx POC Test
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care C-reactive protein devices for acute respiratory tract infections.Infection · 2026Pooled it
- Rapid tests to inform triage and antibiotic prescribing decisions for adults presenting with suspected acute respiratory infection: a rapid evidence synthesis of clinical effectiveness and cost-utility studies.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Use of the FebriDx® host-response point-of-care test may reduce antibiotic use for respiratory tract infections in primary care: a mixed-methods feasibility study.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Trial
- Myxovirus resistance protein A to differentiate between viral and non-viral respiratory infections in adults: a prospective study.Emerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- Rapid Diagnostics for Distinguishing Bacterial and Viral Infections: A Review of Technologies, Clinical Utility, and Stewardship Implications.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Age- and Virus-Composition-Aware Interpretation of Respiratory Viral Co-Detection Using Same-Day C-Reactive Protein Profiles: A 2008-2024 Multiplex PCR Laboratory Cohort Study.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Evaluating myxovirus resistance protein A-based rapid testing combined with pathogen sequencing for arboviral and incidental viral infection surveillance in Senegal.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- A Rapid Test to Differentiate Viral From Bacterial Infections: Searching for the Holy Grail.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Review
- Early signaling of inflammatory bursts by using estimated C-reactive Protein velocity (eCRPv): a model of acute meningitis and iso-CRPinemia.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of an AI-based blood testing device for diagnosis and prognosis of acute infection and sepsis.Nature medicine · 2025Observational
- Optimizing fever management in pediatric emergency medicine: pathophysiology, diagnostics, and evidence-based strategies.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Review
- Trained Immunity in Health and Disease.MedComm · 2025Review
- Impact of Antibiotic Exposure on Pediatric Drug Eruption: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025Article
- Molecular dynamics of the host response to Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia in baboons.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnostic testing and antibiotic stewardship for pneumonia in children worldwide: current developments and next steps.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Real-World Utility of the Host-Response MeMed BV Test in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Non-Randomized Study with Optimized Antimicrobial and Diagnostic Stewardship.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rapid diagnosis of acute pediatric respiratory infections with Point-of-Care and multiplex molecular testing.Infection · 2025Review
- Practical Challenges in the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Serendipity in Emergency Diagnostics: Near Miss of aClinical case reports · 2025Article
- Hidden in plain sight: the impact of human rhinovirus infection in adults.Respiratory research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) account for most outpatient visits. Discriminating bacterial vs viral etiology is a diagnostic challenge with therapeutic implications. Objective: To investigate whether FebriDx, a rapid, point-of-care immunoassay, can differentiate bacterial- from viral-associated host immune response in ARI through measurement of myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) from finger-stick blood. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study enrolled adults and children who were symptomatic for ARI and individuals in a control group who were asymptomatic between October 2019 and April 2021. Included participants were a convenience sample of patients in outpatient settings (ie, emergency department, urgent care, and primary care) who were symptomatic, aged 1 year or older, and had suspected ARI and fever within 72 hours. Individuals with immunocompromised state and recent vaccine, antibiotics, stroke, surgery, major burn, or myocardial infarction were excluded. Of 1685 individuals assessed for eligibility, 259 individuals declined participation, 718 individuals were excluded, and 708 individuals were enrolled (520 patients with ARI, 170 patients without ARI, and 18 individuals who dropped out). Exposures: Bacterial and viral immunoassay testing was performed using finger-stick blood. Results were read at 10 minutes, and treating clinicians and adjudicators were blinded to results. Main Outcomes and Measures: Bacterial- or viral-associated systemic host response to an ARI as determined by a predefined comparator algorithm with adjudication classified infection etiology. Results: Among 520 participants with ARI (230 male patients [44.2%] and 290 female patients [55.8%]; mean [SD] age, 35.3 [17.7] years), 24 participants with missing laboratory information were classified as unknown (4.6%). Among 496 participants with a final diagnosis, 73 individuals (14.7%) were classified as having a bacterial-associated response, 296 individuals (59.7%) as having a viral-associated response, and 127 individuals (25.6%) as negative by the reference standard. The bacterial and viral test correctly classified 68 of 73 bacterial infections, demonstrating a sensitivity of 93.2% (95% CI, 84.9%-97.0%), specificity of 374 of 423 participants (88.4% [95% CI, 85.0%-91.1%]), positive predictive value (PPV) of 68 of 117 participants (58.1% [95% CI, 49.1%-66.7%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 374 of 379 participants (98.7% [95% CI, 96.9%-99.4%]).The test correctly classified 208 of 296 viral infections, for a sensitivity of 70.3% (95% CI, 64.8%-75.2%), a specificity of 176 of 200 participants (88.0% [95% CI, 82.8%-91.8%]), a PPV of 208 of 232 participants (89.7% [95% CI, 85.1%-92.9%]), and an NPV of 176 of 264 participants (66.7% [95% CI, 60.8%-72.1%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, a rapid diagnostic test demonstrated diagnostic performance that may inform clinicians when assessing for bacterial or viral etiology of ARI symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.