ArticleJAMA network open2022
Association Between Electronic Health Record Time and Quality of Care Metrics in Primary Care.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measuring Documentation Burden in Healthcare.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Pooled it
- The use of objective EHR-and schedule-based clinical workload and EHR use measures in predicting inpatient pediatric provider burnout.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- A Structural and Educational Intervention to Improve Inter-Visit Care in an Internal Medicine Residency Clinic: A Multimethod Evaluation.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- The Inbox Problem: Standardized Protocols for Primary Care Teams to Address Patient Messages.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Electronic Health Record Burden Among Gastroenterology Providers in a Large Tri-state Tertiary Referral Center.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Provider comments reveal barriers to EHR nudge effectiveness: process evaluation of a null deprescribing trial.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Time Burden of Electronic Medical Records on Nurses and Physicians in Saudi Arabia: Occurrence, Predictors, and Challenges-A Mixed-Methods Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Taming the In-Basket-How Two Simple Tools Reduced Portal Message Volume in an Academic Internal Medicine Clinic.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Behavioral Phenotypes in Electronic Health Record Use by Primary Care Providers: a Cluster Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence and physician burnout: A productivity paradox.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- Primary care physicians' experiences with inbox triage.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Comparison of physician and large language model chatbot responses to online ear, nose, and throat inquiries.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Primary care staff members' experiences with managing electronic health record inbox messages.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- National trends in oncology specialists' EHR inbox work, 2019-2022.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Human factors and systems simulation methods to optimize peri-operative EHR design and implementation.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Leveraging artificial intelligence to reduce diagnostic errors in emergency medicine: Challenges, opportunities, and future directions.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Review
- Relationships Among Physician Vendor-Derived Proficiency Score, Gender, and Time in the Electronic Health Record.Family medicine · 2025Observational
- Electronic health record and primary care physician self-reported quality of care: a multilevel study in China.Global health action · 2024Article
- Beyond Detection: Towards Actionable Sensing Research in Clinical Mental Healthcare.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2024Article
- Benchmarking Emergency Physician EHR Time per Encounter Based on Patient and Clinical Factors.JAMA network open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Physicians across the US spend substantial time working in the electronic health record (EHR), with primary care physicians (PCPs) spending the most time. The association between EHR time and ambulatory care quality outcomes is unclear. Objective: To characterize measures of EHR use and ambulatory care quality performance among PCPs. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study of PCPs with longitudinal patient panels using a single EHR vendor was conducted at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital during calendar year 2021. Exposures: Independent variables included PCPs demographic and practice characteristics and EHR time measures (PCP-level mean of daily total EHR time, after-hours time, time from 5:30 pm to 7:00 am and time on weekends, and daily EHR time on notes, sending and receiving patient, staff, results, prescription, or system messages [in-basket], and clinical review). Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcome variables were ambulatory quality measures (year-end, PCP panel-level achievement of targets for hemoglobin A1c level control, lipid management, hypertension control, diabetes screening, and breast cancer screening). Results: The sample included 291 physicians (174 [59.8%] women). Median panel size was 829 (IQR, 476-1157) patients and mean (SD) clinical full-time equivalent was 0.54 (0.27). The PCPs spent a mean (SD) of 145.9 (64.6) daily minutes on the EHR. There were significant associations between EHR time and panel-level achievement of hemoglobin A1c control, hypertension control, and breast cancer screening targets. In adjusted analyses, each additional 15 minutes of total daily EHR time was associated with 0.58 (95% CI, 0.32-0.84) percentage point greater panel-level hemoglobin A1c control, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.33-0.71) percentage point greater hypertension control, and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.05-0.52) higher breast cancer screening rates. Each daily additional 15 minutes of in-basket time was associated with 2.26 (95% CI, 1.05-3.48) greater panel-wide hemoglobin A1c control, 1.65 (95% CI, 0.83-2.47) percentage point greater hypertension control, and 1.26 (95% CI, 0.51-2.02) percentage point higher breast cancer screening rates. Associations were largely concentrated among PCPs with 0.5 clinical full-time equivalent or less. There were no associations between EHR use metrics and diabetes screening or lipid management in patients with cardiovascular disease. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found an association between EHR time and some measures of ambulatory care quality. Although increased EHR time is associated with burnout, it may represent a level of thoroughness or communication that enhances certain outcomes. It may be useful for future studies to characterize payment models, workflows, and technologies that enable high-quality ambulatory care delivery while minimizing EHR burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.