Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36255723›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Comparative Safety of the BNT162b2 Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine vs Other Approved Vaccines in Children Younger Than 5 Years.

Nicole Toepfner, Wolfgang C G von Meißner, Christoph Strumann, Denisa Drinka, David Stuppe, Maximilian Jorczyk, Jeanne Moor, Johannes Püschel, Melanie Liss, Emilie von Poblotzki and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole ToepfnerDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Wolfgang C G von MeißnerHausärzte am Spritzenhaus, Family Practice, Baiersbronn, Germany.
Christoph StrumannInstitute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Denisa DrinkaDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
David StuppeDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Rostock, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Maximilian JorczykDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jeanne MoorDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Johannes PüschelHausarztzentrum Greven, Family Practice, Greven, Germany.
Melanie LissPraxis für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Emilie von PoblotzkiPraxis die Kinderaerzte, München, Deutschland.
Reinhard BernerDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Matthias B MoorDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Cho-Ming ChaoDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Rostock, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHCardio-Pulmonary Institute · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin · DEOrthopädische Praxis · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are authorized for use in most age groups. The safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is unknown in children younger than 5 years. Objective: To retrospectively evaluate the safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine used off-label in children younger than 5 years compared with the safety of non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the same sample. Design, Setting, and Participants: This investigator-initiated retrospective cohort study included parents or caregivers who registered children for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in outpatient care facilities in Germany. The study was performed as an authenticated online survey. A total of 19 000 email addresses were contacted from vaccination registration databases between April 14 and May 9, 2022. Inclusion criteria were child age younger than 5 years at the first BNT162b2 vaccination and use of a correct authentication code to prove invitation. Exposures: Off-label BNT162b2 vaccination and on-label non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Reported short-term safety data of 1 to 3 doses of 3 to 10 μg BNT162b2 in children from birth to younger than 60 months are presented. Coprimary outcomes were the frequencies of 11 categories of symptoms after vaccination with bivariate analyses and regression models adjusting for age, sex, weight, and height. Results: The study included 7806 children (median age, 3 years [IQR, 2-4 years]; 3824 [49.0%] female) who were followed up of for a mean (SD) of 91.4 (38.8) days since first BNT162b2 vaccination (survey response rate, 41.1%). A 10-μg dosage was more frequently associated with local injection-site symptoms compared with lower dosages. In the active-comparator analysis, the probability of any symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% CI, 1.43-1.84), local symptoms (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.38-2.05), musculoskeletal symptoms (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.32-4.94), dermatologic symptoms (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 10.7-4.45), or otolaryngologic symptoms (OR, 6.37; 95% CI, 1.50-27.09) were modestly elevated after BNT162b2 compared with non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, whereas the probabilities of general symptoms (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95) and fever (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.32-0.55) were lower after BNT162b2. Symptoms requiring hospitalization (n = 10) were reported only at BNT162b2 dosages above 3 μg. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the symptoms reported after BNT162b2 administration were comparable overall to those for on-label non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this cohort of children younger than 5 years. The present data may be used together with prospective licensure studies of BNT162b2 efficacy and safety and could help guide expert recommendations about BNT162b2 vaccinations in this age group.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesBNT162 VaccineChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesRNA, MessengerVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36255723
PMCPMC9579908
OpenAlexW4306732446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.