Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36255559›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2022

Western gray whales on their summer feeding ground off Sakhalin Island in 2015: who is foraging where?

Lisa K Schwarz, Glenn Gailey, Olga Tyurneva, Yuri Yakovlev, Olga Sychenko, Peter van der Wolf, Vladimir V Vertyankin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa K SchwarzOcean Sciences and Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060, USA. lisa.schwarz@ucsc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-7233
Glenn GaileyCetacean EcoSystem Research, Lacey, WA, 98516, USA.
Olga TyurnevaNational Science Center of Marine Biology, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 690041, Russia.
Yuri YakovlevNational Science Center of Marine Biology, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 690041, Russia.
Olga SychenkoCetacean EcoSystem Research, Lacey, WA, 98516, USA.
Peter van der WolfSakhalin Energy Investment Company, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
Vladimir V VertyankinKronotsky State Biosphere Reserve, Elizovo, Russia.
A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RUKronotsky Reserve · RUSakhalin State University · RUUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the face of cumulative effects of oil and gas activities on the endangered western gray whale, informed management decisions rely on knowledge of gray whale spatial use patterns as a function of demographic group and prey energy. In particular, the gray whale foraging ground off Sakhalin Island consists of two distinct areas (nearshore and offshore) with the offshore feeding area exhibiting markedly high prey energy content. Based on photo-identification data collected from 2002 to 2015, we determined that gray whale use of the offshore feeding area increased with age. Pregnant females were more likely to be sighted only nearshore when nearshore prey energy and the proportion of nearshore energy from amphipods were higher. Likewise, females arriving with calves were less likely to be sighted offshore when the proportion of nearshore energy from amphipods was higher. Photo-identification effort in 2015 was increased substantially, with the intent of maximizing resighting data of individual whales to determine the relative proportion of different demographic groups utilizing the nearshore and offshore feeding areas. Comparing sighting data collected in 2015 with data from all previous years combined, mothers arriving with calves were sighted in the offshore feeding area earlier in 2015, with no evidence that they returned to forage nearshore later in the season. Other reproductive females constituted a higher proportion of the animals foraging nearshore prior to 2015, while juveniles were a higher proportion during 2015. Thus, the offshore feeding area is an important component of the gray whales' annual life cycle, particularly if nearshore prey energy continues to decline, and offshore anthropogenic activities need to be monitored and addressed.

Indexed as

AmphipodaWhalesAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringFeeding BehaviorFemalePregnancySeasonsEschrichtius robustusForagingHabitat usePhoto-identificationPrey energySea of Okhotsk

Identifiers

PMID36255559
PMCPMC9579093
OpenAlexW4306733367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.