Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36255495›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2022

Gray whale density during seismic surveys near their Sakhalin feeding ground.

Glenn Gailey, Mikhail Zykov, Olga Sychenko, Alexander Rutenko, Arny L Blanchard, Lisanne Aerts, Rodger H Melton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Glenn GaileyCetacean EcoSystem Research, Olympia, WA, 98512, USA. ggailey@CetaEcoResearch.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1923-809X
Mikhail ZykovJASCO Applied Sciences Ltd, Dartmouth, NS, B3B 1Z1, Canada.
Olga SychenkoCetacean EcoSystem Research, Olympia, WA, 98512, USA.
Alexander RutenkoFar East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, V.I. Il'ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute, Vladivostok, 690041, Russia.
Arny L BlanchardBlanchard Ecological, North Pole, AK, 99705, USA.
Lisanne AertsLAMA Ecological, Anchorage, AK, 99502, USA.
Rodger H MeltonExxonMobil Exploration Company, Spring, TX, 77389, USA.
Center for Effective Philanthropy · USExxonMobil (United States) · USRussian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oil and gas development off northeastern Sakhalin Island, Russia, has exposed the western gray whale population on their summer-fall foraging grounds to a range of anthropogenic activities, such as pile driving, dredging, pipeline installation, and seismic surveys. In 2015, the number of seismic surveys within a feeding season surpassed the level of the number and duration of previous seismic survey activities known to have occurred close to the gray whales' feeding ground, with the potential to cause disturbance to their feeding activity. To examine the extent that gray whales were potentially avoiding areas when exposed to seismic and vessel sounds, shore-based teams monitored the abundance and distribution of gray whales from 13 stations that encompassed the known nearshore feeding area. Gray whale density was examined in relation to natural (spatial, temporal, and prey energy) and anthropogenic (cumulative sound exposure from vessel and seismic sounds) explanatory variables using Generalized Additive Models (GAM). Distance from shore, water depth, date, and northing explained a significant amount of variation in gray whale densities. Prey energy from crustaceans, specifically amphipods, isopods, and cumaceans also significantly influenced gray whale densities in the nearshore feeding area. Increasing cumulative exposure to vessel and seismic sounds resulted in both a short- and longer-term decline in gray whale density in an area. This study provides further insights about western gray whale responses to anthropogenic activity in proximity to and within the nearshore feeding area. As the frequency of seismic surveys and other non-oil and gas anthropogenic activity are expected to increase off Sakhalin Island, it is critical to continue to monitor and assess potential impacts on this endangered population of gray whales.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringWhalesAnimalsData CollectionSeasonsWaterWaterDistributionDisturbanceSeismic surveySound exposure levelsVessel activityWestern gray whale

Identifiers

PMID36255495
PMCPMC9579086
OpenAlexW4306730709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.