ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2023
A time-frame comparison study of surgical volume shifts on female primary stress urinary incontinence surgery.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to investigate the surgical volume shifts for primary female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) over a 20-year period (1999-2018) in Taiwan.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study based on Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. We divided the time-frame into four periods: first period (1999-2003), second period (2004-2008), third period (2009-2013), and fourth period (2014-2018). The variables included major surgical types for SUI (retropubic urethropexy, pubovaginal sling, midurethral sling, etc.), surgeon gender, specialty, surgical volume (high ≥30, median 5-29, low <5), and hospital accreditation level. Reoperation rates within 1 year were analyzed as an outcome measurement.
resultsA total of 51,018 patients were identified. Major surgical types increased significantly during the first three periods and slightly decreased during the fourth period. The proportion of surgical volume shifted from high- to medium-, and low-volume, but it reversed during the fourth period. The proportion of SUI surgeries decreased in medical centers, whereas it increased in regional and local hospitals. The proportion of SUI surgeries by female surgeons increased. Similar phenomena occurred in MUS. As for surgeon specialty, major surgical types were performed by gynecologists and urologists equally, whereas MUS were performed more by gynecologists than by urologists. Unexpectedly, 1-year reoperation rates were higher in high-volume surgeons.
conclusionsThe surgical trend of SUI surgeries shifted from high- to medium-, and low-volume surgeons, medical centers to regional and local hospitals during the study periods. This implied surgical skills and performance spreading, which may have a great influence on patient and healthcare provider choice of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.