Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36255032›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of cancer care2022

Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among White British and ethnic minority breast cancer survivors in the United Kingdom.

Serena McGuinness, Lyndsay Hughes, Rona Moss-Morris, Myra Hunter, Sam Norton, Zoe Moon

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of cancer care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Improving treatment education in Black and South Asian women.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Serena McGuinnessFaculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8997-3225
Lyndsay HughesPsychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4907-0168
Rona Moss-MorrisPsychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2927-3446
Myra HunterPsychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Sam NortonPsychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1714-9963
Zoe MoonCentre for Behavioural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
Guy's Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Breast Cancer Now 2017MayPR881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAround half of women do not take adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) as prescribed. Research suggests that adherence rates vary across ethnic groups. This study compared AET adherences rates in White British women and women from minority ethnic groups in the United Kingdom.

methodsThis is an observational study with 2001 breast cancer survivors recruited from outpatient clinics. Eligible women were diagnosed with primary breast cancer and prescribed AET within the last 3 years. Adherence was measured using the Medication Adherence Rating Scale. Eligible women were asked to complete a questionnaire pack that collected sociodemographic data such as age, relationship status and ethnicity. Independent samples t tests and χ

resultsOf White British women, 27.8% were classed as non-adherent, compared to 44.4% of women from minority ethnic groups. A logistic regression controlling for relevant demographics indicated that women from minority ethnic groups had a significantly higher risk of non-adherence than women who were White British (odds ratio = 1.50, p = 0.03)

conclusionRates of non-adherence to AET are higher in women from minority ethnic groups, which may contribute towards racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes. Research with larger and more diverse samples is needed to explore this further and to investigate the psychosocial factors driving differences in adherence.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalChemotherapy, AdjuvantEthnic and Racial MinoritiesEthnicityFemaleHumansMedication AdherenceMinority GroupsRetrospective StudiesWhite PeopleAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonalaromatase inhibitorbreast neoplasmscancerethnic groupspatient adherencetamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID36255032
PMCPMC9787781
OpenAlexW4306696863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.