Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36254975›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2023

Molecular hallmarks of long non-coding RNAs in aging and its significant effect on aging-associated diseases.

Syed Aoun Mehmood Sherazi, Asim Abbasi, Abdullah Jamil, Mohammad Uzair, Ayesha Ikram, Shanzay Qamar, Adediji Ayomide Olamide, Muhammad Arshad, Peter J Fried, Milos Ljubisavljevic and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Histone modification clocks for robust cross-species biological age prediction and elucidating senescence regulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. An Update on Neuroaging on Earth and in Spaceflight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Syed Aoun Mehmood SheraziDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Basic & Applied Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Asim AbbasiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Abdullah JamilDepartment of Pharmacology, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Mohammad UzairDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Basic & Applied Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ayesha IkramDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Shanzay QamarDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Adediji Ayomide OlamideDepartment of Chemistry, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.
Muhammad ArshadDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Basic & Applied Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Peter J FriedDepartment of Neurology, Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Division of Cognitive Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (KS 158), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Milos LjubisavljevicDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Ran WangDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University; Mental Health Institute of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Shahid BashirNeuroscience Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is linked to the deterioration of many physical and cognitive abilities and is the leading risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. The growing aging population is a significant healthcare problem globally that researchers must investigate to better understand the underlying aging processes. Advances in microarrays and sequencing techniques have resulted in deeper analyses of diverse essential genomes (e.g., mouse, human, and rat) and their corresponding cell types, their organ-specific transcriptomes, and the tissue involved in aging. Traditional gene controllers such as DNA- and RNA-binding proteins significantly influence such programs, causing the need to sort out long non-coding RNAs, a new class of powerful gene regulatory elements. However, their functional significance in the aging process and senescence has yet to be investigated and identified. Several recent researchers have associated the initiation and development of senescence and aging in mammals with several well-reported and novel long non-coding RNAs. In this review article, we identified and analyzed the evolving functions of long non-coding RNAs in cellular processes, including cellular senescence, aging, and age-related pathogenesis, which are the major hallmarks of long non-coding RNAs in aging.

Indexed as

agingAlzheimer’ diseaseDNA sequenceepigeneticsimmunenon-coding RNAoligonucleotidestelomere-associated

Identifiers

PMID36254975
PMCPMC9827784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.