Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36254889›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of andrology

Enhanced recovery after surgery in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Jing Zhou, Zhu-Feng Peng, Pan Song, Lu-Chen Yang, Zheng-Huan Liu, Shuai-Ke Shi, Lin-Chun Wang, Jun-Hao Chen, Liang-Ren Liu, Qiang Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of andrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jing ZhouDepartment of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Zhu-Feng PengDepartment of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Pan SongDepartment of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Lu-Chen YangDepartment of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Zheng-Huan LiuDepartment of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Shuai-Ke ShiDepartment of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Lin-Chun WangDepartment of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Jun-Hao ChenDepartment of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Liang-Ren LiuDepartment of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Qiang DongDepartment of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) measures have not been systematically applied in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This study was performed on patients with BPH who required surgical intervention. From July 2019 to June 2020, the ERAS program was applied to 248 patients, and the conventional program was applied to 238 patients. After 1 year of follow-up, the differences between the ERAS group and the conventional group were evaluated. The ERAS group had a shorter time of urinary catheterization compared with the conventional group (mean ± standard deviation [s.d.]: 1.0 ± 0.4 days vs 2.7 ± 0.8 days, P < 0.01), and the pain (mean ± s.d.) was significantly reduced through postoperative hospitalization days (PODs) 0-2 (POD 0: 1.7 ± 0.8 vs 2.4 ± 1.0, P < 0.01; POD 1: 1.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.5 ± 1.3, P < 0.01; POD 2: 1.2 ± 0.7 vs 3.0 ± 1.3, P < 0.01). No statistically significant difference was found in the rate of postoperative complications, such as postoperative bleeding (P = 0.79), urinary retention (P = 0.40), fever (P = 0.55), and readmission (P = 0.71). The hospitalization cost of the ERAS group was similar to that of the conventional group (mean ± s.d.: 16 927.8 ± 5808.1 Chinese Yuan [CNY] vs 17 044.1 ± 5830.7 CNY, P =0.85). The International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) scores in the two groups were also similar when compared at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after discharge. The ERAS program we conducted was safe, repeatable, and efficient. In conclusion, patients undergoing the ERAS program experienced less postoperative stress than those undergoing the conventional program.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryProstatic HyperplasiaTransurethral Resection of ProstateHumansMaleQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomeaging malebenign prostatic hyperplasiaenhanced recovery after surgeryprostatetransurethral surgery

Identifiers

PMID36254889
PMCPMC10226510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.