Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36254806›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2022

Engineered skeletal muscle recapitulates human muscle development, regeneration and dystrophy.

Mina Shahriyari, Md Rezaul Islam, Sadman M Sakib, Malte Rinn, Anastasia Rika, Dennis Krüger, Lalit Kaurani, Verena Gisa, Mandy Winterhoff, Harithaa Anandakumar and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Tissue-Specific Expression of the PorcineAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mina ShahriyariInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Md Rezaul IslamDepartment for Epigenetics and Systems Medicine in Neurodegenerative Diseases, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Sadman M SakibDepartment for Epigenetics and Systems Medicine in Neurodegenerative Diseases, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Malte RinnInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Anastasia RikaInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Dennis KrügerDepartment for Epigenetics and Systems Medicine in Neurodegenerative Diseases, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Lalit KauraniDepartment for Epigenetics and Systems Medicine in Neurodegenerative Diseases, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Verena GisaDepartment for Epigenetics and Systems Medicine in Neurodegenerative Diseases, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Mandy WinterhoffInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Harithaa AnandakumarInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Orr ShomroniNGS Integrative Genomics Core Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Matthias SchmidtDepartment of Neurology, Neuromuscular Center, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Gabriela SalinasNGS Integrative Genomics Core Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Andreas UngerInstitute of Physiology II, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Wolfgang A LinkeInstitute of Physiology II, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jana ZschüntzschDepartment of Neurology, Neuromuscular Center, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Jens SchmidtDepartment of Neurology, Neuromuscular Center, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Rhonda Bassel-DubyDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Eric N OlsonDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
André FischerDepartment for Epigenetics and Systems Medicine in Neurodegenerative Diseases, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Wolfram-Hubertus ZimmermannInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Malte TiburcyInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6942-6275
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DESouthwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Münster · DEFraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman pluripotent stem cell-derived muscle models show great potential for translational research. Here, we describe developmentally inspired methods for the derivation of skeletal muscle cells and their utility in skeletal muscle tissue engineering with the aim to model skeletal muscle regeneration and dystrophy in vitro.

methodsKey steps include the directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to embryonic muscle progenitors followed by primary and secondary foetal myogenesis into three-dimensional muscle. To simulate Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell line was compared to a CRISPR/Cas9-edited isogenic control line.

resultsThe established skeletal muscle differentiation protocol robustly and faithfully recapitulates critical steps of embryonic myogenesis in two-dimensional and three-dimensional cultures, resulting in functional human skeletal muscle organoids (SMOs) and engineered skeletal muscles (ESMs) with a regeneration-competent satellite-like cell pool. Tissue-engineered muscle exhibits organotypic maturation and function (up to 5.7 ± 0.5 mN tetanic twitch tension at 100 Hz in ESM). Contractile performance could be further enhanced by timed thyroid hormone treatment, increasing the speed of contraction (time to peak contraction) as well as relaxation (time to 50% relaxation) of single twitches from 107 ± 2 to 75 ± 4 ms (P < 0.05) and from 146 ± 6 to 100 ± 6 ms (P < 0.05), respectively. Satellite-like cells could be documented as largely quiescent PAX7

conclusionsWe introduce human muscle models with canonical properties of bona fide skeletal muscle in vivo to study muscle development, maturation, disease and repair.

Indexed as

Muscular Dystrophy, DuchenneSatellite Cells, Skeletal MuscleHumansMuscle DevelopmentMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalDuchenne muscular dystrophyhypaxial dermomyotomelimb musclesatellite cellsskeletal muscle organoidsomitetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36254806
PMCPMC9745484
OpenAlexW4306691482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.