ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022
Selective human factor VIII activity measurement after analytical in-line purification.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective human factor VIII activity measurement after analytical in-line purification.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It is essential to measure the activity of factor VIII (FVIII) throughout the life cycle of a coagulation FVIII concentrate. Such measurement in nonclinical pharmacokinetic studies is potentially biased by the presence of endogenous nonhuman FVIII, and certain manufacturing process-related additives can also impact the assay performance. Finally, the presence of FVIII activity-mimicking antibodies poses challenges when measuring FVIII in samples. Therefore, we developed an antibody-based chromogenic FVIII assay, which facilitates the selective and sensitive activity measurement of human FVIII in the presence of animal plasma and interfering agents. Methods: Plate-bound monoclonal anti-FVIII antibody specifically captured human FVIII, which was then measured with a chromogenic activity assay. A human reference plasma preparation was used to construct the calibration curve. Spike recovery was carried out in a citrated cynomolgus monkey plasma-solvent/detergent mixture and in the presence of the bispecific antibody emicizumab. Results: The calibration curve ranged from 3.03 to 97.0 mIU FVIII/ml and was obtained repeatedly with good accuracy. B domain-deleted and full-length FVIII did not differ in their responses. Recovery of spiked human FVIII in citrated cynomolgus monkey plasma was 102.7%, while neither native monkey plasma nor the other animal specimen tested showed any activity. Solvent/detergent solution and the bispecific antibody emicizumab had no influence on the assay. Conclusion: Combining antibody-mediated specific capture of human FVIII and a chromogenic activity assay resulted in a selective and sensitive measurement of human FVIII with no interference by endogenous, nonhuman FVIII, manufacturing process additives, or an FVIII activity-mimicking antibody.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.