ArticleArthroplasty today2022
Patients are Most Interested in Which Hip Arthroplasty Approach? A 15-year Google Trends Analysis.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- "E-Spot" (Obturator 'E'xternus Tendon Femoral Origin) as an Intraoperative Landmark for Femoral Preparation During "Off-Table" Anterior Approach.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Transition from the posterior to the Superior Transverse Anatomic Reconstruction (STAR) approach for total hip arthroplasty : no learning curve and improved early postoperative outcomes.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- The Routine Use of Femoral Heads Sized 40 mm or Greater in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Practice.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Quality of ChatGPT Responses to Frequently Asked Questions in Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the public interest in total hip arthroplasty (THA) based on approach by analyzing Google Trends online search volume trends between 2007 and 2021. Methods: Data were obtained by querying the Google Trends online search tool for key terms and phrases relating to anterior, posterior, lateral, and minimally invasive approaches to THA. Data from January 2007 to December 2021 were utilized. Relative search volume (RSV) was generated for each THA approach group based on historical search volume trends in the United States. Results: Over the 15-year period, Google Trends Search Data demonstrated a statistically significant increase ( Conclusions: The anterior approach to hip arthroplasty has demonstrated a consistent and statistically significant increase in RSV over the past 15 years that has outpaced the increases observed in the posterior and minimally invasive approaches. Despite the increase in public awareness and interest for anterior approach hip arthroplasty, it is yet to demonstrate any long-term clinical benefits over other approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.