Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36254180›Full record

ReviewThe World Allergy Organization journal2022

Long-term effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in pediatric and adult patients with moderate-to-severe inadequately controlled allergic asthma.

Nicola A Hanania, Robert Niven, Pascal Chanez, Deschildre Antoine, Pascal Pfister, Lorena Garcia Conde, Xavier Jaumont

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Biologics in severe asthma: a state-of-the-art review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  11. Single-Domain Antibodies-Novel Tools to Study and Treat Allergies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. T helper 2 cells in asthma.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Long-term mepolizumab treatment reduces relapse rates in super-responders with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicola A HananiaSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert NivenManchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Pascal ChanezClinique des Bronches, de l'Allergie et du Sommeil, Department of Respiratory Diseases, APHM, Aix-Marseille University, France.
Deschildre AntoineCHU Lille, Université Nord de France, unité de pneumologie et allergologie pédiatriques, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, 59000 Lille, France.
Pascal PfisterNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Lorena Garcia CondeNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Xavier JaumontNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHBaylor College of Medicine · USManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omalizumab is recommended as an add-on therapy in patients aged ≥6 years with inadequately controlled, moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma. The efficacy and safety of omalizumab treatment in allergic asthma clinical trials and its effectiveness in the real world have been reported in numerous studies. In this review, we examine clinical evidence in pediatric and adult patients with allergic asthma who received omalizumab treatment for at least 2 years, to assess its effectiveness, durability, and trajectory of response over time as well as safety. We performed a literature search from inception until March 2022 in PubMed using the keywords "omalizumab" and "allergic asthma" to retrieve articles examining the effects of omalizumab in patients with allergic asthma, aged ≥6 years. Only articles that evaluated the effectiveness of omalizumab for at least 2 years were included. Data from case reports were excluded. Our review confirmed the long-term effectiveness and safety of omalizumab, demonstrating reduced rate of exacerbations, improved lung function, asthma control, and quality of life, decreased health care resource utilization, and use of corticosteroids (oral/inhaled) with a favorable safety and tolerability profile for up to 9 years in adult patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. Similar results were also observed in the pediatric population with up to 7.5 years of omalizumab treatment. This review highlights and confirms the sustained clinical benefits of omalizumab over long periods of treatment in pediatric and adult populations with allergic asthma.

Indexed as

Allergic asthmaEfficacyLong-termOmalizumabPediatricSafety

Identifiers

PMID36254180
PMCPMC9519799
OpenAlexW4297058750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.