ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2022
Characteristics and outcome of traumatic cardiac arrest at a level 1 trauma centre over 10 years in Sweden.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Financial Value of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound During Traumatic Cardiac Arrest.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Thoracic vascular injury remains the leading cause of death in traumatic haemorrhage: Analysis of injury patterns and time to death.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting Mortality and Clinical Outcomes in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Thoracic Trauma: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Prehospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients with Suspected Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A BRAIN PROTECT Sub-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Emergency Department Survival of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Unlocking survival in traumatic cardiac arrest: global insights, innovations, and unmet needs.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Associations between four standard interventions as well as epinephrine use and sustained ROSC, 30-Day and one-year survival of patients in traumatic cardiac arrest: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-guided Emergency Pericardiocentesis Simulation on Human Cadavers: A Scoping Review.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Appropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration and predictors of return of spontaneous circulation in traumatic cardiac arrest.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Trauma center vs. nearest non-trauma center: direct transport or bypass approach for out-of-hospital traumatic cardiac arrest.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- The outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest based on the etiology of cardiac arrest; A scoping review.PloS one · 2025Article
- Contemporary management of traumatic cardiac arrest and peri-arrest states: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024Review
- Traumatic Cardiac Arrest-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Traumatic cardiac arrest - a nationwide Danish study.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHistorically, resuscitation in traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) has been deemed futile. However, recent literature reports improved but varying survival. Current European guidelines emphasise the addressing of reversible aetiologies in TCA and propose that a resuscitative thoracotomy may be performed within 15 min from last sign of life. To improve clinician understanding of which patients benefit from resuscitative efforts we aimed to describe the characteristics and 30-day survival for traumatic cardiac arrest at a Swedish trauma centre with a particular focus on resuscitative thoracotomy.
methodsRetrospective cohort study of adult patients (≥ 15 years) with TCA managed at Karolinska University Hospital Solna between 2011 and 2020. Trauma demographics, intra-arrest factors, lab values and procedures were compared between survivors and non-survivors.
resultsAmong the 284 included patients the median age was 38 years, 82.2% were male and 60.5% were previously healthy. Blunt trauma was the dominant injury in 64.8% and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 38. For patients with a documented arrest rhythm, asystole was recorded in 39.2%, pulseless electric activity in 24.8% and a shockable rhythm in 6.8%. Thirty patients (10.6%) survived to 30 days with a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 3 (n = 23) or 4 (n = 7). The most common causes of death were haemorrhagic shock (50.0%) and traumatic brain injury (25.5%). Survivors had a lower ISS (P < 0.001), more often had reactive pupils (P < 0.001) and a shockable rhythm (P = 0.04). In the subset of prehospital TCA, survivors less frequently received adrenaline (epinephrine) (P < 0.001) and in lower amounts (P = 0.02). Of patients that underwent resuscitative thoracotomy (n = 101), survivors (n = 12) had a shorter median time from last sign of life to thoracotomy (P = 0.03), however in four of these survivors the time exceeded 15 min.
conclusionSurvival after TCA is possible. Determining futility in TCA is difficult and this study demonstrates survivors outside of recent guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.