Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36253778›Full record

ArticleImmunity & ageing : I & A2022

The impact of circadian rhythms on the immune response to influenza vaccination in middle-aged and older adults (IMPROVE): a randomised controlled trial.

Yihao Liu, Hui Zhang, Gang Yuan, Mi Yao, Bin Li, Jianying Chen, Yuling Fan, Ruohui Mo, Fenghua Lai, Xinwen Chen and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunity & ageing : I & A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Immunosenescence and susceptibility to respiratory viruses: a state-of-the-art review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Aberrant METTL1-mediated tRNA mNature communications · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Circadian immunity from bench to bedside: a practical guide.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Sleep and critical illness: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yihao Liu *Clinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58, ZhongShan Road 2, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Hui Zhang *Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Gang Yuan *Phase I Clinical Trial Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Mi Yao *Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Public Health Building, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Bin Li *Clinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58, ZhongShan Road 2, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Jianying ChenBaiyun Street Community Health Service Center, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Yuling FanShipai Street Community Health Service Center, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Ruohui MoClinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58, ZhongShan Road 2, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Fenghua LaiDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58, ZhongShan Road 2, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Xinwen ChenClinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58, ZhongShan Road 2, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Mengyuan LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Binfeng ChenDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Janet M LordInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sui PengClinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58, ZhongShan Road 2, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China. pengsui@vip.163.com.
KarKeung ChengClinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58, ZhongShan Road 2, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China. K.K.Cheng@bham.ac.uk.
Haipeng XiaoDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58, ZhongShan Road 2, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China. xiaohp@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Birmingham · GBCommunity Health Center · USNIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P001874/1The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University Y70311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination is important in influenza prevention but the immune response wanes with age. The circadian nature of the immune system suggests that adjusting the time of vaccination may provide an opportunity to improve immunogenicity. Our previous cluster trial in Birmingham suggested differences between morning and afternoon vaccination for some strains in the influenza vaccine in older adults. Whether this effect is also seen in a younger age group with less likelihood of compromised immunity is unknown. We therefore conducted an individual-based randomized controlled trial in Guangzhou to test the hypothesis that influenza vaccination in the morning induces a stronger immune response in older adults than afternoon vaccination. We included adults in middle age to determine if the effect was also seen in younger age groups.

resultsOf the 418 participants randomised, 389 (93.1%, 191 middle-aged adults aged 50-60 years and 198 older adults aged 65-75 years) were followed up. Overall, there was no significant difference between the antibody titers (geometric mean /95% CI) after morning vs afternoon vaccination (A/H1N1: 39.9 (32.4, 49.1) vs. 33.0 (26.7, 40.7), p = 0.178; A/H3N2: 92.2 (82.8, 102.7) vs. 82.0 (73.8, 91.2), p = 0.091; B: 15.8 (13.9, 17.9) vs. 14.4 (12.8, 16.3), p = 0.092), respectively. However, in pre-specified subgroup analyses, post-vaccination titers for morning versus afternoon vaccination in the 65-75 years subgroup were (A/H1N1): 49.5 (36.7, 66.6) vs. 32.9 (24.7, 43.9), p = 0.050; (A/H3N2): 93.5 (80.6, 108.5) vs. 73.1 (62.9, 84.9), p = 0.021; (B): 16.6 (13.8, 20.1) vs. 14.4 (12.3, 17.0), p = 0.095, respectively. Among females, antibody titers for morning versus afternoon vaccination were (A/H1N1): 46.9 (35.6, 61.8) vs. 31.1 (23.8, 40.7), p = 0.030; (A/H3N2): 96.0 (83.5, 110.3) vs. 84.7 (74.4, 96.5), p = 0.176; (B): 14.8 (12.7, 17.3) vs. 13.0 (11.3, 14.9), p = 0.061, respectively. In the 50-60 years old subgroup and males, there were no significant differences between morning and afternoon vaccination.

conclusionsMorning vaccination may enhance the immunogenicity to influenza vaccine in adults aged over 65 and women. An intervention to modify vaccination programs to vaccinate older individuals in the morning is simple, cost free and feasible in most health systems.

Indexed as

AgeingCircadianImmunityInfluenza vaccinationOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID36253778
PMCPMC9574181
OpenAlexW4306382089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.