Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36253771›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2022

Loss to follow-up of HIV-exposed infants for confirmatory HIV test under Early Infant Diagnosis program in India: analysis of national-level data from reference laboratories.

Nilesh Gawde, Suchit Kamble, Noopur Goel, Kalyani Nikhare, Shilpa Bembalkar, Mohan Thorwat, Dhanashree Jagtap, Swarali Kurle, Neeru Yadav, Vinita Verma and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nilesh Gawde *Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Suchit Kamble *ICMR - National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India. skamble@nariindia.org.
Noopur GoelICMR - National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India.
Kalyani NikhareICMR - National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India.
Shilpa BembalkarICMR - National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India.
Mohan ThorwatICMR - National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India.
Dhanashree JagtapICMR - National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India.
Swarali KurleICMR - National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India.
Neeru YadavTata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Vinita VermaNational AIDS Control Organisation, New Delhi, India.
Neha KapoorNational AIDS Control Organisation, New Delhi, India.
Chinmoyee DasNational AIDS Control Organisation, New Delhi, India.
National AIDS Research Institute · INNational AIDS Control Organisation · INTata Institute of Social Sciences · INNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly Infant Diagnosis was launched in India in 2010 and its effect on the diagnosis of HIV-exposed infants needs to be assessed. The present study was done to find out the median age at DBS sample collection for early infant diagnosis and its trend over years, the median age at diagnosis of HIV among the HIV-exposed infants with DNA PCR tests, and the proportion of infants who completed testing cascades after detection of HIV-1 in a sample.

methodsDNA PCR data (from 2013 to 2017) maintained at all regional reference laboratories in India was collated with each infant identified by a unique code. Cohort analysis of the infant data was used to find the median age at sample collection and diagnosis. The outcomes of testing in each cascade and the overall outcomes of testing for infants were prepared.

resultsThe median age at sample collection for the four years combined at all India level was 60 days (48-110 days). The median age at diagnosis of HIV was 285 days (174-418 days). HIV-1 was detected in samples of 1897 (6.3%) infants out of 30,216 infants who had a DNA PCR test, out of whom 1070 (56.4%) completed the testing cascade and the rest were lost to follow-up.

conclusionThe data highlights delay in diagnosis; both due to delay in sample collection and turn-around-times. Loss to follow-up of HIV-exposed infants with virus detection is a significant concern to the Early Infant Diagnosis and tracking systems need to be strengthened.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityChild, PreschoolEarly DiagnosisFollow-Up StudiesHumansIndiaInfantInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalLaboratoriesEarly infant diagnosisHIV-exposed infantsLoss to follow-up from EID testing cascade

Identifiers

PMID36253771
PMCPMC9578277
OpenAlexW4306651633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.