Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36253658›Full record

ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2023

Novel endoscopic approaches using the endocytoscopy for the target biopsy in esophageal eosinophilia.

Koichi Muroi, Naomi Kakushima, Kazuhiro Furukawa, Satoshi Furune, Nobuhito Ito, Takashi Hirose, Emiko Hida, Tomohiko Suzuki, Takahiro Suzuki, Keiko Hirai and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Koichi MuroiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan. muroi328@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Naomi KakushimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Kazuhiro FurukawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Satoshi FuruneDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Nobuhito ItoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Takashi HiroseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Emiko HidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Tomohiko SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Takahiro SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Keiko HiraiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Hiroyuki ShibataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Eri IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Tsunaki SawadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Keiko MaedaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Takeshi YamamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Eizaburo OhnoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Masanao NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Mitsuhiro FujishiroDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Hiroki KawashimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMultiple biopsies are recommended for the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) because inflammatory changes are frequently patchy. Reports on EoE using endocytoscopy (ECS) are limited. This present study aimed to assess if diagnostic yield improves by adding ECS on conventional white light imaging (WLI) in patients with esophageal eosinophilia (EE).

methodsA total of 284 biopsy specimens from 71 patients with a known diagnosis of EE were enrolled and divided into the WLI group (156 specimens) or the ECS group (128 specimens). Four biopsies from 5 and 10 cm proximal to the esophagogastric junction were taken from each patient. In the ECS group, the biopsy was performed where bilobed nuclei were observed. The biopsy sensitivity for EE, eosinophil count of a single specimen and the biopsy sensitivity of each endoscopic finding were evaluated between both groups.

resultsThe sensitivity of a single biopsy specimen was higher in the ECS group than that of the WLI group (62.5 vs. 41.7%, P < 0.001). In addition, the median eosinophil count in the ECS group was significantly higher [19 vs. 6.5/high-power field (HPF), P < 0.001]. For each endoscopic finding, ECS-based biopsy had higher sensitivity than that of WLI in the diagnosis of edema (33.1 vs. 11.3%, P = 0.007) and linear furrows (75.8 vs. 52%, P = 0.005).

conclusionThis study showed that adding ECS to WLI improved the biopsy sensitivity and eosinophil detection in patients with EE.

Indexed as

Eosinophilic EsophagitisEsophagoscopyBiopsyEnteritisEosinophiliaGastritisHumansBiopsyEndocytoscopyEosinophilic esophagitisEsophagus

Identifiers

PMID36253658
OpenAlexW4306652754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.