Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36253589›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2023

Acquisition of orthographic forms via spoken complex word training.

Elisabeth Beyersmann, Signy Wegener, Jasmine Spencer, Anne Castles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The role of morphemic knowledge during novel word learning.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elisabeth BeyersmannSchool of Psychological Sciences, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, 16 University Avenue, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. lisi.beyersmann@mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9653-6106
Signy WegenerSchool of Psychological Sciences, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, 16 University Avenue, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Jasmine SpencerSchool of Psychological Sciences, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, 16 University Avenue, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Anne CastlesSchool of Psychological Sciences, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, 16 University Avenue, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study used a novel word-training paradigm to examine the integration of spoken word knowledge when learning to read morphologically complex novel words. Australian primary school children including Grades 3-5 were taught the oral form of a set of novel morphologically complex words (e.g., (/vɪbɪŋ/, /vɪbd/, /vɪbz/), with a second set serving as untrained items. Following oral training, participants saw the printed form of the novel word stems for the first time (e.g., vib), embedded in sentences, while their eye movements were monitored. Half of the stems were spelled predictably and half were spelled unpredictably. Reading times were shorter for orally trained stems with predictable than unpredictable spellings and this difference was greater for trained than untrained items. These findings suggest that children were able to form robust orthographic expectations of the embedded morphemic stems during spoken word learning, which may have occurred automatically without any explicit control of the applied mappings, despite still being in the early stages of reading development. Following the sentence reading task, children completed a reading-aloud task where they were exposed to the novel orthographic forms for a second time. The findings are discussed in the context of theories of reading acquisition.

Indexed as

LanguageLearningAustraliaChildEye MovementsHumansVerbal LearningEye trackingMorphological processingReading acquisitionSpoken-word learning

Identifiers

PMID36253589
PMCPMC10104914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.