Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36253442›Full record

SynthesisMolecular psychiatry2023

Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Taro Kishi, Toshikazu Ikuta, Kenji Sakuma, Makoto Okuya, Masakazu Hatano, Yuki Matsuda, Nakao Iwata

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
17.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Taro KishiDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan. tarok@fujita-hu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-2236
Toshikazu IkutaDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, School of Applied Sciences, University of Mississippi, University, Oxford, MS, 38677, USA.
Kenji SakumaDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Makoto OkuyaDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Masakazu HatanoDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Yuki MatsudaDepartment of Psychiatry, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
Nakao IwataDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3189-6076
Fujita Health University · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of antidepressants to treat adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the maintenance phase. This study searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases and included only double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with an enrichment design: patients were stabilized on the antidepressant of interest during the open-label study and then randomized to receive the same antidepressant or placebo. The outcomes were the 6-month relapse rate (primary outcome, efficacy), all-cause discontinuation (acceptability), discontinuation due to adverse events (tolerability), and the incidence of individual adverse events. The risk ratio with a 95% credible interval was calculated. The meta-analysis comprised 34 studies (n = 9384, mean age = 43.80 years, and %females = 68.10%) on 20 antidepressants (agomelatine, amitriptyline, bupropion, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, vilazodone, and vortioxetine) and a placebo. In terms of the 6-month relapse rate, amitriptyline, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine outperformed placebo. Compared to placebo, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had lower all-cause discontinuation; however, sertraline had a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Compared to placebo, venlafaxine was associated with a lower incidence of dizziness, while desvenlafaxine, sertraline, and vortioxetine were associated with a higher incidence of nausea/vomiting. In conclusion, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had reasonable efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability in the treatment of adults with stable MDD.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderAdultAmitriptylineAntidepressive AgentsCitalopramDesvenlafaxine SuccinateDuloxetine HydrochlorideFemaleFluoxetineFluvoxamineHumansMirtazapineParoxetineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReboxetineSertralineAmitriptylineAntidepressive AgentsCitalopramDesvenlafaxine SuccinateDuloxetine HydrochlorideFluoxetineFluvoxamineMirtazapineParoxetineReboxetineSertralineThiazepinestianeptineVenlafaxine HydrochlorideVortioxetine

Identifiers

PMID36253442
OpenAlexW4306404458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.